In the case Emily Rutherford v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp., the gas company owned a utility easement across a portion of landowner Rutherford's property. In order to service the gas line under the easement, the gas company needed to cut down seven trees belonging to Rutherford, who then filed suit seeking an injunction prohibiting the trees from being cut down. The district court ruled against Rutherford, declaring that the gas company had the right to cut down the seven trees on her property. On appeal, the district court's ruling was affirmed. Rutherford argued that because the gas company had allowed the trees, then small, to remain on the property when the pipeline was installed in the 1950s, the gas company must have contemplated large trees growing over the pipeline.The Court of Appeals rejected this argument, reiterating the precedential rule of law that an express easement without clear dimensions must be interpreted in consideration of what is reasonable and ...
by Andrew Wetzel | on Mar 22, 2017
by Gill South | 17 hours
by Brad Inman | 2 days
by Andrea V. Brambila | 1 day
by Brad Inman | on Mar 21, 2017