Guest Post: Landlords asked to ban smoking
By Marlowe, Thursday, June 21, 2007.Bookmarking Sites
The Health Department in Portland, Ore., and the American Lung Association have a proposition for landlords: Go smoke-free and save money.
A survey of renters found that 75 percent in the Portland metro area would prefer to live in buildings with nonsmoking policies, while only 25 percent said their landlords have such policies.
The Portland Smokefree Housing Project has the seal of approval from the Fair Housing Council of Oregon, which assures landlords that smoking is not a protected activity and property owners have the right under Fair Housing laws to restrict smoking in or on their property.
But the real message is financial: Smokers cost property owners money, especially when units turn over. It is more costly to clean carpets and repaint. Some property owners report they've had to use sealants and replace smoke-infested woodwork to eliminate the smell after smokers moved out.
Many landlords are concerned that it may be illegal to ban smoking or discriminate against smokers, and fear lawsuits from prospective tenants for violating Fair Housing laws.
Says Pegge Mcguire, Executive Director, Fair Housing Council of Oregon, "Property owners and managers should know that they have every right under Fair Housing laws to restrict smoking in and on their property. Smoking is not a protected class; neither smokers nor the act of smoking is included as a protected class under federal, state, or local Fair Housing laws."
Tenants are also informed that there is no "Right to Smoke" ordinance and if they're bothered by second-hand smoke, they do have rights and options available to them too.
In searching the Web site, however, I find no advice for smoking renters, except to quit smoking.
--Marlow Harris, 360 Digest
All rights reserved. This article may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.
Add A Comment
You must login or register to post a comment.
Submitted by Anonymous on July 7, 2007 - 3:16am.
Smoking has recently been banned in all enclosed spaces in the UK and about time too. We are living in the 21st century and all are fully aware of how much damage the habit does. It is about time everybody realised that smokers don't have any rights. Oh, by the way; I smoked for 23 years so I am fully aware of both sides of the argument. Smokers should wise up and quit right now!
Submitted by Anonymous on July 21, 2007 - 8:44am.
One can see the agrument regarding 2nd hand smoke.
Should one be able to discriminate simply on the basis that one can only rent versus owning a home? Would one argue the same if one lived in a neighborhood where everyone owned their own homes? Perhaps they should read the rights of homeowners when speaking about renters in general.
I see many smokers who have taken up to smoking on their balcony. Should parents leave their children unattended to smoke a cigarette on a public sidewalk. Or how about a house bond person where it would be a struggle? And while we are at it should they allow it for those who cry how effective it is while using their marijuana for medical treatment. And as one person put it - you could do a line of cocaine on the sidewalk and no one would say anything then if you were smoking a cigarette.