New lead gen site: Calif. Dept. of Insurance
By Matt Carter, Friday, October 19, 2007.Bookmarking Sites
The California Department of Insurance has added a link on the home page of its Web site that, with a click of a mouse, takes consumers to an industry-sponsored title insurance rate shopping site -- bypassing the state's own, harder-to-find, but arguably more useful, rate comparison tool.
The last time I switched my auto insurance coverage, about six or seven years ago, I did so after stumbling on a rate comparison tool on the California Department of Insurance's Web site. I'd been with the same company for years, and ignored all those offers you get in the mail from other companies because I thought my carrier (one of those companies with a bunch of As in it) couldn't be beat.
The Department of Insurance search tool -- which surveys consumers on the actual rates they pay, but doesn't provide actual quotes -- suggested there were several auto insurers offering much better rates.
Another reason I'd never been that interested in shopping around was I'd heard horror stories about what a nightmare it could be to get the bargain basement insurers to pay a claim. One thing that was particularly useful about the Department of Insurance site was it provided performance and comparison data about each company, including complaints from consumers.
Turned out the cheapest company for my area also had one of the best track records on performance, so I switched. My wife and I saw our premiums go down by several hundred dollars a year and we have saved literally thousands of dollars on our auto insurance. We've had a couple of minor claims that were hassle free. I recommend this company to people all the time whether or not they've asked for my advice.
When I tried out the auto insurance search tool today, I got a list of 47 companies, with consumers reporting rates for a standard policy for a married couple with no violations ranging from $1,394 (my current insurer!) to $6,056. Our old insurer was charging couples in our area $2,852 a year.
The Department of Insurance offers a very similar search tool for title insurance. You choose your transaction type, county, and amount, and you get back a list of companies and what they might charge you (based on a 2006 survey of consumers). Plus you can click on a "company profile" link for company performance and complaint information -- and a phone number for getting an actual quote.
The industry now has its own title insurance rate shopping site, TitleWizard, which is operated by a private company on behalf of the California Land Title Association. Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner was on hand to publicize the site's launch Oct. 9, calling it "a first step to infuse competition into the Title insurance industry." And, it goes with out saying, a less painful first step than the $1 billion rate rollback proposed last year by Poizner's predecessor, John Garamendi.
The Department of Insurance not only endorses the site, but has taken the unusual step of linking to it on the home page of the department's official Web site. Clicking on "NEW! Compare title insurance rates" under "Highlights" takes visitors away from the Department of Insurance, to www.clta.titlewizard.com.
If you want to get to the Department of Insurance's title insurance rate comparison tool from the home page, you have to go to the "Consumer" drop down menu, select "Premium Comparisons" and then choose from the different lines of insurance there. If you don't already know where to look, it's a lot easier to end up on the industry's Web site than the state's.
So how do the sites compare?
The Department of Insurance site generates a chart, showing what each company charges for:
-- a "CLTA standard form policy" insuring the owner
--an "ALTA residential policy, which provides more coverage than the basic CLTA policy including matters not disclosed in public records such as survey boundaries, and property access rights
-- an "ALTA Homeowner's Policy" with even broader coverage including easements, lack of access, encroachments, violations of codes, violations of deed covenants, and conditions or restrictions -- the default policy for the California Real Estate Sale and Purchase Agreement - Contract Form.
--Title Lender Fee, or the fee paid for the portion of the title insurance policy that protects the lender.
When I searched the Department of Insurance site for a policy on a $450,000 transaction in Oakland, Calif., I got 17 results, ranging from $1266 to $1,608 for the ALTA Homeowner's policy. I got an equal number of estimates for title lender fee, ranging from $546 to $668.
With TitleWizard, if I entered the same information, identifying myself as the buyer (that's who pays for title insurance in Alameda County) I was given 10 estimates, for title lender fees, ranging from $517 to $577, but none for a homeowner's policy. The only way I could get information for a homeowner's policy was to run another querry as the seller. That got me 10 results, ranging from $1,228 to $1,820.
While both sites probably have their pluses and minuses,, the industry site offered fewer companies and less information than the Department of Insurance site that was already in place when TitleWizard was launched with much fanfare.
If the Department of Insurance wants to pat the industry on the back for its efforts, that's their call. But should they be redirecting consumers who come to them as a reliable, trusted soruce of information away to an industry-sponsored Web site?
Something tells me the auto insurer I ended up with after using the Department of Insurance's rate comparison tool might not have been included on a site operated by their competitors. They're just kicking their tails too hard.
All rights reserved. This article may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.

Add A Comment
You must login or register to post a comment.
Submitted by Anonymous on October 20, 2007 - 4:31pm.
Wow, Matt. Good reporting.
Submitted by Anonymous on October 21, 2007 - 7:36am.
Title Wizard does NOT provide "lead generation" back to the title industry. It is a good faith effort by the title industry with the title industry to provide "current" and "accurate" "ability to compare rates" to the Real Estate consumers of the State of California.
Your paranoia about it might be warranted based on your past experience with Auto Insurance, but it is not based in fact here. CLTA has stood up and done the right thing here and so has Commissioner Poizner.
Submitted by Anonymous on October 21, 2007 - 9:42am.
Rich, before you attribute Matt's concerns to "paranoia," and argue that it isn't based in fact, maybe you should re-read his post. His experience was that the state's mechanism offered nearly twice as many choices as the industry site. While such results don't necessarily mean the industry site is flawed, it certainly calls for an explanation. Perhaps you have one, and/or can tell us what the industry site brings to the table that the state's mechanism does not?
-Michael
Submitted by Anonymous on October 21, 2007 - 10:52am.
Why is the California state government directing consumers to certain companies?
Submitted by Anonymous on October 23, 2007 - 6:30am.
The truth is, the Dept of Insurance does not have the resources to maintain their title insurance rate site so many of the rates you see are not current. Still, they appropriately advocate the availability of title rate information. Note that the TitleWizard also provides office information, company information, title policies and will shortly offer title insurance quotes for "buyer-pay" counties as well as "no-loan" transactions. As noted in another post, the TitleWizard is not a click-thru "lead-gen" site, rather it provides company, rate and ofice location information so consumers and real estate professionals can easily contact one or more title companies to further evaluate and or purchase title insurance.
Submitted by Anonymous on October 23, 2007 - 8:47am.
When I tested TitleWizard for a search in our area, it completely overlooked at least one large title company with an office here. Not only that, when I checked the office information on a couple of companies with local offices, the local offices were not shown.
I e-mailed CLTA about this, but (not surprisingly, perhaps) have received no response.
- Fred Merriam
Prudential California Realty - Auburn
Submitted by Anonymous on October 23, 2007 - 10:09am.
Rich and Tony, I agree that "lead gen" is not really the right term to use here, although I was applying it to the Dept. of Insurance Web site, not TitleWizard.
By providing a link to TitleWizard on its home page, the Dept. of Insurance is acting as more of a referral site for TitleWizard.
If not inappropriate, it strikes me as unprecedented for a government agency that regulates an industry to offer rate comparisons, and then send consumers to an industry-sponsored Web site without further explanation or warning that they are leaving the Dept. of Insurance site.
Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner has publicly endorsed TitleWizard as part of an alternative to state-mandated rate reductions, without mentioning that the state already offers a similar (if not better, in some respects) site.
If providing a Web site where consumers can compare rates and educate themselves about title insurance is so important to fostering competition, it seems the Dept. of Insurance would also want to promote (and maintain?) its own site.
(Rich Macaluso is the president and COO of Orange Coast Title, and immediate past president of the California Land Title Association. Tony Farwell is the CEO of ClosingCorp, the developer of TitleWizard.)
Submitted by Anonymous on October 23, 2007 - 8:14pm.
"Rich Macaluso is the president and COO of Orange Coast Title, and immediate past president of the California Land Title Association. Tony Farwell is the CEO of ClosingCorp, the developer of TitleWizard ..."
Well, then, we can trust what they say, implicitly! No conflict of interest, there.