Guest Post: Enterprise solutions quietly slip into real estate

Story Tools Sponsored by:

Story Tools Sponsored by HomeGain

Real estate as an industry has never embraced enterprise class technology platforms. The reasons are obvious - the industry evolved from a national patchwork of local brokerages serviced by local title and settlement providers, all running on mom-and-pop systems. During the "enterprise system 1990s," corporations started to consolidate their disparate operations and systems into the holy grail of a unified platform. But the real estate industry seemed to care less if title data and other documents could even be e-mailed, I remember waiting for my prelim title report sent by snail mail during a 2003 refi. Here's a list of real estate clients using BEA's enterprise solutions - no big names - a perusal of real estate customers at big enterprise system firms like SAP yield a similarly puny customer base.


Generally speaking, every title insurance company settlement platform, MLS system and brokerage system seems to have been developed internally and they don't communicate with each other well. The RETS initiative is a good example of how difficult it is just to get MLS systems to standardize the data fields they use to describe property information.

Real estate is now awakening to the fact that Internet technology is becoming the catch-all solution for marketing, lead generation, processing and aftercare. This opens up the opportunity to get brokerages and lenders to adopt enterprise solutions from technology providers instead of coding everything themselves. The most logical players to take advantage of this trend are the title companies that already provide settlement service platforms. Newer companies like SecondSpace are now implementing their search engine solutions to real estate companies like Florida's St. Joe that will essentially run their online presence.

This trend to providing backbone enterprise solutions is a different business model than selling systems components to the brokerages (example: Leadqual sells a lead qualification system that enhances only a segment of the brokerage's business) or providing APIs to brokerages to custom build new applications. Today at Transparent, I look at one company, Cyberhomes, a subsidiary of Fidelity Title's FNRES, that is quietly building a backbone solution that can potentially manage all the bells and whistles of a brokerage Web site.

--Pat Kitano, Transparent Real Estate

Add A Comment

You must login or register to post a comment.

 
Submitted by Anonymous on October 5, 2007 - 1:57pm.

Pat you are so right about MLS's and real estate companies building their own backends. Infolink is a perfect example of this. They just had to build their own platform that did not work well, still doesn't, and never will because they sit in the Silicon Valley their CTO talked someone into doing their own thing rather than taking really well designed MLS systems currently in use in other areas of the country and customizing for Infoseek. Every CTO I've ever known wanted to do their own thing and not buy out of the box solutions. It will probably take the Title and Escrow industry to move this engine along since the larest ones are pretty close to being national anyway. It sure will be fun to watch.

 
Submitted by Anonymous on October 5, 2007 - 2:14pm.

Because we offer this type of solution, this post covers a topic that I am particularly passionate about. I've believed for a while now that one of the biggest problems that brokerages have is a completely disjointed system for managing their agents. A majority of what takes place online and offline within a brokerage is driven from the bottom up instead of the top down. When you are dealing with challenges such as consistent online marketing efforts, operational efficiencies, etc. I just don't believe that top down can be effective. I think it is one of the big reasons that the general public is somewhat unsure about agents right now. There is simply too much inconsistency. Brokers hold the keys to fixing that problem.