When pulling house off market, how long is long enough?
By Jessica Swesey, Friday, February 15, 2008.
How do you define "days on market" for property listings? It would seem that number would be a pretty simple one to track -- uh, the number of days since the home was first listed for sale?
Wrong. The answer is "it depends."
Back in 2006, Inman News looked at some brewing controversy over days on market as it pertained to a practice known as "re-listing," in which agents pull listings off the market and re-list in order to reset the number of days on market to zero and make the listing look newer in the eyes of other agents and buyers.
That period between pulling a listing and putting it back on the market could be called "days off the market," or "time out." And this week, a related issue has come up in Washington, D.C., where a local business journal is reporting that MRIS, the major MLS serving the area, has decided to decrease from 180 to 90 the number of days a property is required to be off the market before the MLS resets the days on market number to zero when it is re-listed.
The Washington Business Journal quotes a local buyer's broker, Stephen Israel, as saying, "It's absolutely a knee-jerk reaction to the market… It's great for the seller who can't sell their house, they get a clean slate in 90 days instead of 180." Israel is president of Buyer's Edge in Bethesda, Md.
MRIS told the Journal it was simply part of an ongoing policy review and that the 180 days was an arbitrary figure selected in 1993.
Regardless, days on market is a contested issue among industry participants. In some cases, agents have said this information can easily be misinterpreted and penalizes sellers by making the house seem like there's something wrong with it. Other brokers, such as ZipRealty, display the information on every listing they have data for. (See reader's reactions to the topic of re-listing.)
What do readers think? Is this a move that aims to mask market conditions in which homes may be extremely difficult to sell? Or is this change simply adjusting the off-market period to a more reasonable time frame?
Remember that we're in an era of increased demand for transparency, and while moves like this may not intend to deceive, they could be interpreted that way.
UPDATE: A local Washington, D.C. area Realtor, Heather Elias, has shared more details about the MRIS change in the comments section below.
All rights reserved. This content may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this content without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.

Tweet This
Facebook
LinkedIn
You must login or register to post a comment.
Submitted by Rick Belben on June 22, 2008 - 5:30pm.
In Orlando a home use to be reset to 0 days whenever it was relisted. As with anything it was abused by some who continually withdrew a listing then would enter it again as a new listing so it would not show a high number of days on the market. Now a home has to be off the market for 30 days to get the DOM set to 0.
Rick Belben
Amerivest Realty of Central Florida
Orlando Real Estate
Orlando MLS
Submitted by Larry Hotz on November 30, 2008 - 8:30am.
"Giving it a rest".
That's what we used to call it in the Denver area market. But, it cannot really be done anymore. Even if days on the market "starts over". The entire listing history is now stored and accessible from every listing with one click of a mouse. That is the kind of transparency that the stock market and securities market should have had.
It's great for the consumer but hard on the Seller.
Larry Hotz
Denver Real Estate
Castle Pines North Real Estate