Your house, please -- and your badge, too

Story Tools Sponsored by:

Story Tools Sponsored by HomeGain

Foreclosure is not just about losing your house -- if you have access to classified information, you run the risk of losing your security clearance, too.

A foreclosure process on a home, as a sign of financial distress, could be viewed as a warning sign to employers of folks who work in high-security jobs, a California Realtor tells Inman News. Not a good idea to have people in financial distress working in high-security jobs, right?

Here's an interesting case in which a facility security officer failed to report a deed in lieu of foreclosure and was denied clearance after a hearing by an administrative judge, though the case does not make it clear if this clearance would also have been denied if the deed in lieu of foreclosure had been properly reported.

U.S. State Department guidelines establish financial considerations in a person's access to classified information.

"Failure or inability to live within one's means, satisfy debts, and meet financial obligations may indicate poor self-control, lack of judgment, or unwillingness to abide by rules and regulations, all of which can raise questions about an individual's reliability, trustworthiness and ability to protect classified information," according to the guidelines.

"Inability or unwillingness to satisfy debts" and "indebtedness caused by frivolous or irresponsible spending and the absence of any evidence of willingness or intent to pay the debt or establish a realistic plan to pay the debt" are among the conditions that could "raise a security concern and may be disqualifying."

Maybe it's better for high-level security officials to rent than risk foreclosure?

You must login or register to post a comment.

 
Submitted by Jim Bisnett on May 21, 2008 - 4:22pm.

That's a very interesting point. Almost like employers that run your credit report and deny a position based on poor credit.

Refinance Tool Box

 
Submitted by on May 22, 2008 - 12:41am.

Seems reasonable given what some people will do for money and when put under tremendous stress.

Joe

Selling Your Home in Fall | Highland Hills, Austin Texas

 
Submitted by Ki Gray on May 28, 2008 - 2:06am.

Yeah it makes sense. I have always wondered if people in certain high level situations should have there purchases looked over. You always here of a 30k a year guy at the CIA buying a million dollar house and people thinking it was "wierd" but never investigating it. I almost think that for a few key people their financial records should be somewhat open.

Site Austin Tx real estate.
Search Austin MLS
Blog Austin Real Estate Blog

 
Submitted by Chuck Marunde, J.D. on June 1, 2008 - 8:18pm.

Having been a JAG in the USAF, and understanding the importance of a security clearance in one's career, I would say if there was any risk of financial insecurity and potential foreclosure, it definitely would be better to rent rather than risk one's career and entire financial future. But if one has a good career and salary and benefits, the risk of suddenly going into foreclosure would be low, unless one had made very poor choices with regard to an ARM that will increase in rates and payments. But then now would be the right time to refi with interest rates at a 30-year historical low.

Chuck Marunde, J.D.
Real Estate Attorney (Ret.)
Broker/Owner/Realtor
SequimPortAngeles.com

Advertise with Inman