Imitation building materials don't flatter
Do fake construction products justify the discount?
By Arrol Gellner, Friday, March 12, 2010.The other morning I stopped at a local mom-and-pop coffee stand to grab some breakfast. I was about to settle for a toasted bagel when a charmingly hand-lettered sign near the register caught my eye.
"Homemade Breakfast Sandwich," it read. "A toasted English muffin with crispy bacon, fresh eggs and medium cheddar cheese."
Although I wouldn't dream of ordering such a thing from the typical fast-food joint, the handwritten sign and homey locale made it sound pretty enticing. Visions of bacon and eggs sizzling on the griddle wafted into my head.
Imagine my reaction when, perhaps 30 seconds after I'd ordered it, the proprietor handed me a scalding hot yet soggy something-or-other straight from the microwave. The "fresh eggs" were some sort of prefabricated, pale-yellow patty, the bacon a pre-fried strip of salt, and the "medium cheddar" a glossy orange square of Velveeta.
So much for a "homemade" sandwich.
Now, it happens that this shop's owners are recent immigrants from an Asian country famous for its fresh, healthy cuisine. Why, I wondered, would they even offer greasy, salty, precooked American pap that tastes like a simulation of actual food?
I think the answer is that we Americans, old and new alike, are slowly but surely resigning ourselves to accept fakery in everything we buy -- even those of us who, like the coffee shop folks, ought to know better.
The construction field is no exception. Wannabe building materials -- the architectural equivalent of junk food -- are rapidly becoming the default standard in remodeling and new construction alike. Consider the typical building project: On the outside are Styrofoam moldings meant to look like cement, or cement moldings meant to look like stone, or plastic moldings meant to look like wood.
On the roof you may variously find asphalt shingles masquerading as cedar, concrete ones masquerading as clay, or rubber ones pretending to be slate.
Exterior walls are liable to be dressed up in vinyl or pressed sawdust siding, usually embossed with an outrageous caricature of wood grain. Windows, more often than not made of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastic, will have fake grids thrown in to make them look more like the genuine wooden kind.
Inside you'll find pressed sawdust doors, also straining mightily to look like wood. Underfoot are "hardwood" floors that are actually plastic laminated over a photograph of the real article, or perhaps "linoleum" flooring that's made out of yet more PVC. The kitchen countertops might be "stone" conjured out of polymethyl methacrylate and aluminum trihydrate.
Now, many of these wannabe materials are ostensibly used to save money, and granted, they may sometimes be cheaper than the genuine article. Yet if you figure in the all-important cost of labor, there are plenty of fakes -- imitation stone countertops and artificial slate roofing are good examples -- whose price only just barely undercuts the real thing.
Not to mention that the lion's share of imitation materials, many of which are petroleum-based, are inherently less green than the things they seek to imitate. Which ought to make us think twice about what we choose to build with. Put another way: Do we hold out for real medium cheddar, or just settle for Velveeta?
***
What's your opinion? Leave your comments below or send a letter to the editor. To contact the writer, click the byline at the top of the story.
All rights reserved. This article may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.


You must login or register to post a comment.
Submitted by Matt Sicignano on March 12, 2010 - 2:15pm.
Good thoughts in your article, but you pressed the point, in my opinion, when you said "many of the materials are ostensibly used to save money". Oriented strand board for flooring and roofing that won't warp when wet; pressed concrete siding for stability and ease of maintainence; factory built trusses that add strength and consistency; they may all be less expensive than the "real stuff', but they are all much better in terms of construction quality and longevity, not to mention much easier maintainence issues.
Submitted by Joseph Marovich on March 12, 2010 - 5:03pm.
Perhaps the vendors of the real thing ought to do more marketing to the target buyers who are trying to "go green" and are willing to pay a little more for the real thing. But where are the real things coming from? Forests that are unsustainable? Are the materials shipped (thereby nullifying the green in some instances) more costly than locally produced "fake" products? I've seen articles on manufactured stone countertops made from fly ash and glass and aluminum cans and plastic bottles that look and feel and wear better than the real thing and they are more green than the real thing if you take into account that they are recycling man's cast offs. The vendors for the real thing are charging an arm and a leg. And some of the real things aren't as energy efficient as their replacements. This is not an easy sort out.
Joseph Marovich, ABR,ASR,e-PRO,GREEN,GRI,PMN,RSPS,SRES
Inductee REBAC Hall of Fame
MAROVICH BUSINESS INSTITUTE
www.MarovichBusinessInstitute.com
732 961-9618