Bridging the divide on REO inspections

Why are banks so afraid of disclosure?

Inman News®

DEAR BARRY: My friend is trying to buy a house and is concentrating on foreclosed properties. He usually makes an offer and then hires a home inspector. If the inspector finds many problems, my friend doesn't buy the house. So far, he's done this twice. What seems unfair is that the next buyer who comes along has to pay for a home inspection when one has already been done. This seems like a rip-off.

If an existing inspection report were available to download, a buyer could simply ask the seller if any repairs have been done since the last dated inspection. How many times must a home be inspected in such a short period of time? --Roy

DEAR ROY: What you say makes sense, but there are two roadblocks that prevent public dissemination of home inspection reports on foreclosed properties. The first is home inspector liability. The second is the unwillingness of banks to provide disclosure on properties that they own. Let's take these in order.

When you hire a home inspector, you sign an inspection agreement. That contract specifies conditions that are within the scope of a home inspection and conditions that are not. Issues that are typically outside the scope of an inspection include environmental hazards, energy efficiency, portions of the property that are concealed from view, geological stability, low-voltage wiring, forecasting future leakage, and so on. When buyers sign the contract, they acknowledge and accept these exclusions, and the inspector is relieved of liability for those kinds of defects.

If inspection reports were made available to future buyers, the inspector would have no contractual relationship with those people. If a problem that is not within the scope of the inspection were discovered after the close of escrow, the buyers could take legal action against the home inspector, and the limitations specified in the contract would not be binding in that transaction. For this reason, home inspectors are strongly opposed to the publication and common use of their inspection reports, regardless of whether the property is a foreclosure. ...CONTINUED

Share with REmessenger

You must login or register to post a comment.

 
Submitted by Rob Aubrey on October 20, 2009 - 3:45am.

I can understand the bank's position on not doing an inspection. What if something is missed? Does that open the bank up to liability?

There are some things that are subjective. I know that in my state there are no home inspectors license. They may belong to associations, but they are not licensed. There can be a huge liability for them especially on older homes. I have seen inspection reports make serious derogatory remarks on electrical work, to then bring out an electrician to say it was safe.

Not to say that there are not good home inspectors, but most do not have real world building experience. They can only tell you it is not perfect but do not have the credentials to say just because it is not perfect doesn't make it unsafe.

Again back to the older homes, forget code. Code has changed some many times the odds of you finding an 60-80 or even a 100 year old house that is code is damn near impossible.

On the other hand that is why there are some really good deals and you need to know that you are not going to get a smoking hot deal where the property is in spotless move in condition.

 
Submitted by Ted Jernigan on October 20, 2009 - 3:53am.

Foreclosures, estate owned properties and investor owned properties are exempted from the normal disclosure process in Texas. For owner occupied homes the disclosure notice asks if any inspections have been conducted in the past two years and whether those are available for review. Buyers should not rely on such inspections as their only source of information about property condition, but they are conveyed if a seller has them.

Ted Jernigan
Ebby Halliday REALTORS
McKinney, Texas 75071
www.TeamJernigan.com
972-489-6173