$6,500 tax credit concerns

Must current home be sold to qualify?

Inman News®

DEAR BENNY: My wife and I are considering a move to Arizona. As we have lived in our current townhome for six years, I am sure we would be eligible for the homebuyer credit of $6,500. What I cannot find is any reference about if and when we must sell our current home. Can we buy a replacement home by the cutoff date of April 30, 2010, then sell our current residence later in the year? Or if we make the new house our principal residence, are we required to sell our current residence at all? --John

DEAR JOHN: According to the Internal Revenue Service, you do not have to sell your current house -- which must have been owned and used as a principal or primary residence for at least five consecutive years of the eight-year period ending on the date of purchase of a new home as a primary residence -- in order to take advantage of the new $6,500 tax credit for repeat homebuyers so long as the new house becomes your primary house.

There are, however, some additional limitations. While you do not have to purchase a home that is more expensive than your current home to qualify for the credit, if your new home costs more than $800,000, you are not eligible for that credit.

There are also income limitations. For single taxpayers, you cannot make more than $125,000 annually; for married folks, you cannot earn more than $225,000 if you file a joint tax return. There is a phase-out until your income reaches $145,000 for a single taxpayer or $245,000 for joint tax filers. This means that the credit is reduced proportionately until you reach the ceiling cap.

You cannot purchase the new home from family members, which includes parents, grandparents or children.

And finally, the purchase must take place by April 30, 2010. However, if you have entered into a binding contract before that date, you must settle (go to escrow) by June 30, 2010, or you will lose this credit.

This is my opinion; I suggest you consult your own tax advisors for specific advice.

DEAR BENNY: My wife and I own a rental house that is now paid off. We are thinking of gifting it to our three daughters and their spouses. It is appraised by the county for around $100,000 and would probably fetch that on the market. We could gift it in one year at that value, but am wondering just how to do so. If they could turn around and sell it, would they avoid the recapture of taxes on the depreciation? Also, would we need a professional appraisal or could we get several valuations from Realtors and take the average to come up with the amount? --Joe

DEAR JOE: You and your wife can each gift (completely tax-free) up to $13,000 this year to each of your daughters and their husbands. That comes to $78,000 ($13,000 multiplied by 6). The remaining $22,000 may have a taxable impact on you later, and you should consult with a tax attorney before you proceed with that gift.

Keep in mind that if the property is worth $100,000, and if you sell it through a real estate agent, you will have to pay a commission in the range of 5-6 percent. Accordingly, I think that you should be able to deduct this commission (which you will not have to pay) in determining the actual amount of your gift. ...CONTINUED

Share with REmessenger

You must login or register to post a comment.

 
Submitted by Hank Bailey on January 5, 2010 - 10:31am.

Make sure you remind that fsbo that they can use Legalzoom.com and save a heck of a lot more over paying a lawyer. Or the other idea, state specific, is to use a title company versus a lawyer whose costs can be meteoric in nature by comparison. You guys have to pay for those impressive legal degrees somehow don't you.

What too many times people who think they are saving money by not going with a broker don't clearly understand is that there are so many legal and other changes going on in the real estate business today that we "Realtors" have to study our trade every day and live it 24/7 to keep up. How are they going to deal with topics that could put them in litigation? After all, ignorance is no excuse to break the law right?

Furthermore, that selling agent bringing a FSBO a buyer represents the "buyer." This would be akin to you telling someone "not" to get a lawyer in a contract negotiation to save a few bucks when the other side has an attorney (a.k.a shark) at the table.

You would not in fact do that yet because you are a "hallowed" attorney yourself and we are the "great unwashed" it is easy to forget these points. I may be a Realtor, a salesman, and not an "educated attorney," but this salesman has a degree from a leading national business school and is a member of MENSA so I didn't just fall of the truck yesterday as we say in the South.

Warmest Regards,
Hank Bailey, REALTOR®
ASSOCIATE- BROKER
hankbailey@prudentialgeorgia.com
(c)706-621-1895