Feds wise to homebuyer fraud plot
How quest for low interest rate could snowball into foreclosure
By Bernice Ross, Tuesday, August 4, 2009.
Editor's note: Meet Bernice Ross at the upcoming Real Estate Connect conference in San Francisco, which runs from Aug. 5-7, 2009. She will be available to meet with conference attendees from 12:30 p.m. to 1:30 p.m. in the Palace Hotel's Ralstom Room. Click here to send Bernice a message.
DEAR BERNICE: My husband and I would like to purchase an investment property in the suburbs where we grew up. We are currently renting a great loft condo downtown and love the city lifestyle. Our mortgage broker is telling us that if we do not occupy the property, we will have to pay a much higher interest rate. Can't we tell the lender that we're going to move into the property and then change our minds and rent the house instead? How's the lender going to know? --Michelle B.
DEAR MICHELLE: The answer to your question is that "yes," you could defraud the lender. Plenty of people have tried doing this in the past and a large number of them have been caught. If you went through a federally chartered bank or obtained an FHA, Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae loan, you will face federal charges. This is a criminal offense.
The reason this is considered mortgage fraud is that investor loans are more likely to default. This means the lender has more risk. The higher interest rate reflects that risk. In essence, this is comparable to lying about how much you earn. My advice: Don't even think of doing this.
In response to your question, "How's the lender going to know?" there are a number of ways. First, are the utilities at the property in your name? Is there a phone at the new address in your name? Is the mortgage payment being sent to your current address rather than the new address? Is your mail being sent to the new address? Do you have a full owner's insurance policy on the property where the bill is being sent to the property address? I have seen buyers make all of these changes and they were still caught.
What are the consequences? Even if the lender doesn't press charges against you, there is a high probability that they will "call the loan." In other words, you will have to immediately payoff the entire loan balance. Because of the fraud, it's unlikely that another lender will give you a loan. The result: a foreclosure and virtually irreparable damage to your credit.
You do have options. You could live in the property for at least one year. If you wait at least a year before you rent the property, it's less likely to be an issue. On the other hand, since you really love your current lifestyle, perhaps the best possible solution is to find a great downtown condo. That would allow you to enjoy the lifestyle you love and you wouldn't have to worry about misrepresenting your situation to the lender. If you decide to move to the suburbs later, loft condos often make good rentals.
When you fill out a loan application, there are numerous ways that the lender can find out whether you're lying about your income or other circumstances. When it comes to your loan application, honesty is always the best policy. ...CONTINUED
All rights reserved. This article may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.


You must login or register to post a comment.
Submitted by Peter Contostavlos on August 4, 2009 - 12:24pm.
Isn't there a distance requirement for 2nd homes that needs to be met to be a 2nd personal residence?
Submitted by Peter Contostavlos on August 4, 2009 - 12:25pm.
When in doubt as to whether or not it needs to be disclosed it is always better to disclose. Err on the side of caution.
Submitted by Jack Fleming on August 4, 2009 - 12:55pm.
Hey Bernice
Regarding the SPD I tell the seller to disclose everything they know. Because If they don't it will come back and bite them in the rear end.
After all a disclosure is going to be a lot happier than a lawyer at $250 per hour.
Submitted by chis eliopoulos on August 4, 2009 - 1:39pm.
This is the "mine set' of most borrowers/buyers now and before the crash.Most claim ignorance yet are going and have done illegal acts to get what they want.Many real estate and mortgage brokers had accommodated this kind o behavior that in the end led us to the biggest real estate disaster of the last hundred years.The feds/HUD have come up with more disclosure forms, and I'm sitting here scratching my head thinking how any disclosure can protect people from their own greed?
Not that the lending institutions are "innocent" .The concept of "higher cost for higher risk" is been exploited to the hilt by them.
In my humble opinion if people want to do what they want, they have to find other ways than the banks to finance their ventures.
Submitted by Paul Francis, CRS on August 4, 2009 - 7:50pm.
Unless of course you are part of the "Friends of Angelo" program where you can have two primary residences.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090727/ap_on_go_co/us_senators_mortgages
"Feinberg also told House investigators that Countrywide counted both of Dodd's homes as primary residences.
"He was allowed to do both of those as owner-occupied, which is not allowed. You can only have one owner-occupied property. You can't live in two properties at the same time," he said."
• Dodd heads the Banking Committee and is a major player in two big areas: solving the housing foreclosure and financial crises and putting together an overhaul of the U.S. health care system.
LOL!!
Paul Francis, CRS
Prudential Americana Group
www.LasVegasRealEstateHome.com
702.592.3058