Lawsuit feared when mortgage rescue goes awry

Faltering business has investors looking for payback

Co-written by Samuel J. Tamkin
Inman News

Q: My younger brother spent a year working as an employee in a mortgage company that helped people who were in foreclosure. He ended up putting 10 houses in his name with the hopes that these individuals would pay him and then buy back their houses after a year.

This hasn't happened and my brother had to leave the business due to financial problems. He figures that the owner of the business has stopped paying the investors who own the loans, and they are now calling my brother because they can't reach the real owner of the property.

My brother is very fearful of a lawsuit. We own a cottage together. The cottage is in his name and we split the payment and upkeep 50/50.

We're afraid that these investors may try to take our cottage. My brother mentioned doing a "quitclaim deed" that would put the cottage in our name; however, the mortgage would be in his name alone.

Would this protect our cottage? Have I given you enough information to help us?

A: You have given me probably too much information. Your brother should have known better than to take title to property that he did not own in his own name.

If the owner of the mortgage business wanted to have the title to the homes, the title should have been in the owner's name or the owner's company's name.

There are people in the marketplace who claim to help homeowners with their financial troubles but are really only out to make money for themselves at the expense of these distressed owners.

Some companies claim that if a homeowner is in financial trouble, the homeowner can transfer title to the home to the company and when they get back on their feet, the company will, for a small fee, transfer the title back to them.

But in practice, the homeowners are wiped out of any interest they have in the home, and the so-called "helpful mortgage company" either resells the property or refinances it, taking all the equity out of it.

There's a common name for this scam: It's called "mortgage rescue fraud," and the Federal Trade Commission and the FBI are very concerned about the proliferation of this scam in the current real estate marketplace.

It certainly seems that your brother might have participated in that type of venture. A legitimate business would never place title to homes in the name of an employee. Your brother's bigger issue is, perhaps, having participated in a fraud and having the authorities come after him.

He should seek the help of an attorney immediately.

With respect to the cottage, the quitclaim deed transfer likely will not work. If your brother has creditors coming after him, the cottage is at risk. If he transfers title to you, the creditors will have some time to unwind the transfer to you. When a debtor tries to get rid of assets right before a creditor has as right to those assets, the transfer itself is a fraud against creditors.

If you assist your brother in taking title to the cottage, you may find yourself in hot water for helping himself and you out. Because the cottage is in his name, the cottage will be presumed to be his. The fact that you share expenses is irrelevant and was a poor planning move on both of your parts.

For more details, and to learn about other options that may be available to you, please talk to a real estate attorney.

Q: Can you live in one state and claim residency in another? Our home is one mile inside the state line, but we want to claim residency in the other state.

A: The short answer is no. If you live in one state, you can't claim residency in another. You can split the time you reside in one state or another. But if you own a home, vote in your district, have a driver's license from the state, receive mail at your home, send your children to school and consider one state your home, you can't simply "claim" residency in another state -- even if that state is one mile away.

Your question answers itself. You live in one state. That is the state of your residency. Residency is made up of many elements, including where you spend most of your time, where your home is located, where you vote, where you have mail sent, where your children go to school, where you file your tax returns, where your car is registered. The list of items proving residency is quite substantial.

To claim residency in another state, you'd basically have to move and live there.

To get even more valuable advice from Ilyce, visit her Personal Finance and Real Estate Center.

***

What's your opinion? Leave your comments below or send a letter to the editor. To contact the writer, click the byline at the top of the story.

Story Tools Sponsored by:

Story Tools Sponsored by HomeGain

Add A Comment

You must login or register to post a comment.

 
Submitted by elizabeth fox on March 14, 2008 - 6:32am.

What happens to a homeowner on a short sale or full foreclosure as far as their liability to the debt? Is there deficiency judgement that the lender or homeowners association can come back to them to pay?

How does a short sale or short refi affect their credit? Does it still report as a foreclosure?

 
Submitted by on March 14, 2008 - 2:27pm.

It is my understanding that the mortgage company "COULD" file a deficiency judgement against the homeowner. In today's world, more mortgage companies are filing deficiency judgements. Foreclosures actually affect their credit, but short sales may or may not it. It really depends on how it's reported by the mortgage company. Hope this helps!

Always Remember...Live Well, Laugh Often, Love Lots!!!

Socar Chatmon-Thomas
Chairman Austin Board of Realtors

 
Submitted by Lisa Burkett on March 14, 2008 - 2:34pm.

It may also depend on how your short sale is negotiated. When you submit a short sale packet to a lender for approval, you could put in as a stipulation that the bank not file a deficiefncy judgement against you for the difference. There are companies out there that specialize in short sales that have more knowledge than I do, and speaking with someone would be in your best interest.

Lisa Burkett
Broker, John L Scott, Portland OR

 
Submitted by Carroll Straus on March 14, 2008 - 7:39pm.

As far as short sales, it depends on state law-- but in most states there are "anti deficiency statutes" put in place after the Great Depression. IF the loan is a "purchase money" loan, there can be ony one action-- usually non-judicial foreclosure. Less costly than judicial foreclosure, but still expensive, and not that great for the lender.

If there is a short sale, however, the terms of it are fully negotiable. But why would an owner agree to a deal that left him worse off? (I.s. with a judgment hanging over his head and a possible IRS problem?) They won't. They will stay in the house as long as they can, or just walk away. Most banks are still asking far too much at foreclosure auctions (i.e. all they are owed) and not many homes are selling. Houses that are sitting empty are deteriorating and (in warmer climes) pools are causiing public nuisances by breeding mosquitoes. So a homeowner in distress may just walk away, or some will stay and hunker down. Either way, the resolution is delayed and the bank loses.

So, eventually, smart banks will enter into smart short sale agreements. in a contract BOTH sides get something. That is the entire point of any contact.