Buyers need dose of real estate 1.5
Mood of the Market
By Tara-Nicholle Nelson, Monday, August 31, 2009.
Flickr photo by trekkyandy.Over the last few weeks, I've had several buyers walk in my office doors suffering from Real Estate Agent PTSD: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. They've worked with other agents who were, shall we say, a poor fit for them -- let's just leave it at that. And most of them were apparently very introspective about why exactly the relationship didn't work, leading them to apologize in advance for some personality flaw of their own that they believed might have been the deal-killer to their previous Realtor relationship:
- "I'm sorry -- I think I must be too picky."
- "I have to tell you up front, I really don't like to be stood up. It's just a pet peeve. Sorry!"
- "I'm very nervous about making such a big decision. I think my nerves must have run her off."
Now, don't get me wrong. Most of these former agents were not "bad" agents, per se (except for the serial "stander upper" -- that's just not cool.) I'm sure they see themselves as hard-working, tech-savvy folk. They stay up on the technologies necessary to be a buyer's broker in this day and age, including automatic listing updates via e-mail; they have Facebook pages; and a few even are reliable texters, Tweeters or have their own blogs.
To give these other agents even more of the benefit of the doubt, I attract a group of clients who want or need extra care. You know how some agents have monikers like, "The Real Estate Artist" or -- I actually saw this on a guy's business card -- "The Real Estate Assassin" (don't even ask)? If I had one of those nicknames, it would be The Real Estate Therapist or, in terms the Real Estate Assassin might understand, "Real Estate Consigliere."
I have a master's degree in psychology and have built my entire business around understanding the psychological impediments to sound real estate decision-making and advising and coaching clients through that obstacle course.
But as these clients were filing in last week, I kept thinking to myself -- and actually said aloud -- hey, "I don't sell shoes." No offense to shoe salespeople, but if I sold shoes, I would probably be irritated by super-picky and hesitant buyers.
However, what I sell is probably the largest purchase these people will ever make -- their home. And if they can get past their fear and anxiety and overwhelm enough to give me the honor of advising them on this largest purchase, I can hold their hands, have my shoulder cried on, talk them off some ledges, and otherwise be a little more patient with them than I would be otherwise.
In fact, I would hazard a guess that if I walked into Nordstrom or Macy's right now and announced my intention to plop down a few hundred grand on shoes, my esteemed colleagues in the footwear world would probably tolerate my questions and anxieties pretty patiently, too! Buyers should expect nothing less from their brokers and agents.
So, with all the technologies that cutting-edge agents bring to the table, and the corresponding potential increase in the efficiencies of house hunting (for buyers) and pricing and marketing (for sellers), I don't believe that what the average real estate consumer wants is what we in the industry have come to call real estate 2.0.
They want more. Or, actually, less. If real estate 1.0 was the old-school consigliere model where your agent flipped open a big book of listings, handpicked a few and then drove you around to see them, and real estate 2.0 is the disconnected model where you send your agent some MLS numbers you pulled from Realtor.com, meet them at a few or go see them on your own at the open houses, what do consumers really want?
They want real estate 1.5. ...CONTINUED
All rights reserved. This article may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.


You must login or register to post a comment.
Submitted by Louis Cammarosano on August 31, 2009 - 12:53pm.
Hi Tara
Thanks for this. I suppose Homegain has been ahead of the game all along by being slightly behind.
I made the case against 2.0 for real estate back in Feb of 2008.
http://blog.homegain.com/blogging-and-social-networking/the-failed-promi...
Submitted by Kathy Judy on August 31, 2009 - 3:55pm.
Tara-Nicholle, you are RIGHT RIGHT RIGHT! That's what all the techno people have been missing. You can tell when you watch them speak that they really don't understand why the 2.0 stuff doesn't work the way they logicallly think it should.
Submitted by Ruthmarie Hicks on September 2, 2009 - 5:33pm.
Louis,
What a pathetic way to spam for business. I do very well on the web without you - thank you very much. I don't need to fork over 30%+ of my hard-earned commission to someone who spent tons of VC for a fancy site and contributed nothing but email addresses and phone numbers - half of them fake - and then distributed them to hundreds of agents. The leads I generate myself are MINE - ALL MINE and I don't have to cough up 30% to get them.
Lead generators in general offer very little true value to either agents or clients. In the end they only drive up costs by inserting yet another very unnecessary middle man into the mix. Eventually, that cost would have to be absorbed by the clients. But lead generators are truly desperate right now. They haunt my cell phone daily.
My philosophy to lead generators is simple. I don't give them my money - not one penny.