'Fix-and-finance' a cure for foreclosures?
Effort targeted at Fannie, Freddie REO inventory
By Tom Kelly, Thursday, February 12, 2009.Tom DiMercurio has spent nearly 40 years analyzing, managing and selling foreclosed properties. He is the brains behind BuyBankHomes.com, a Web site that provides foreclosure information to interested parties such as consumers, investors and real estate agents. When a bank finds itself with a ton of real estate-owned (REO) inventory, he's often called on to propose a liquidation strategy.
Now, DiMercurio is spending his own money in offering a solution to a national foreclosure problem that seems to be getting larger every day. He's made two trips to the nation's capital trying to get in front of legislators with an idea that he feels could stabilize neighborhoods torn apart by empty homes no longer properly maintained.
He's written Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, seeking to discuss a plan similar to the successful one he devised for the devastated Houston, Texas, market of 1986-88. He would welcome the chance to chat with James B. Lockhart, the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, about a fix-and-finance idea that would help eliminate the negative stigma of a foreclosed home.
Here's the core of the pitch: If Fannie and Freddie (who collectively have more than 100,000 REO assets) allocated $5 billion for rehabilitation of those properties and $20 billion for financing, they could self-finance all of their newly refurbished inventory with low down payments, reduced closing costs and quick turn-around times -- while removing 100,000 assets without affecting liquidity -- allowing that cash for other transactions. Fannie and Freddie would then have a $25 billion book of new loans from borrowers who value the homes.
"My view is this is largely a liquidity-neutral play for Fannie and Freddie," DiMercurio said. "The $25 billion is non-earning now, and the removal of one-eighth of the growing foreclosure inventory would help to stabilize many neighborhoods. It also assists in the very mission of Fannie and Freddie."
Special financing makes sense, especially now, given the continuing liquidity problems and credit tightening restrictions making the sale of REO and conventional homes increasingly difficult.
How did the nation get into such a predicament? A decade of cheap money and incredibly flexible loan programs offered by many lenders sparked overbuilding by developers, a flip-and-run mindset for speculators, and unrealistic expectations for first-time homebuyers blinded by the low payments of a short-term loan. While the equity gained by rising home prices can cover many ill-conceived loan mistakes, a flat or sinking market only compounds problems for lenders and owners.
DiMercurio managed Fannie Mae's Houston operation from 1986-1988 when one-third of all Fannie Mae's national REO inventory was situated in the five counties surrounding the nation's fourth-largest city. The Houston experience, in the sheer volume of localized foreclosures and the severity of the absolute value decline from peak to valley, rivaled the worst financial performance in U.S. history.
During the Houston slump, brought on by a declining oil industry, the resale market for REOs was challenged by a widely held public view that foreclosed homes were surely the result of a building defect or other shortcoming that made them less desirable than a regular (nonforeclosure) residential property. DiMercurio's team, working with Fannie Mae in Washington, D.C., conceived a plan to brand "Fannie Mae as the Best Housekeeper in Houston," celebrating the like-new condition of restored Fannie Mae-acquired properties.
Offered with below-market, fixed interest rates, a maximum of a 97 percent loan-to-value for owner-occupants, reduced closing costs, 30-day closings and refurbishment to a like-new condition, Fannie Mae homes were extremely popular in the Houston residential real estate market for several years.
"Rehabbed homes and self-financing discourage low-price sales to investors who have to make a profit," DiMercurio said. They also discourage auctions, which often set the bottom value. And, low-down-payment loans are not counterintuitive. Borrowers pay when they perceive value … that's why many are not paying now."
To accelerate the rehabilitation process, Fannie Mae's Houston office operated like a consolidated real estate disposition and construction company. A contractor/builder partner bought carpet, paint and roofing material by the container load directly from the warehouse, reducing the costs of refurbishing the foreclosed homes.
In order to rekindle the home-buying process, we must find a way to show buyers what they pay for today will not be less tomorrow. More owner-buyers mean stronger neighborhoods.
***
What's your opinion? Leave your comments below or send a letter to the editor. To contact the writer, click the byline at the top of the story.
All rights reserved. This article may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.


You must login or register to post a comment.
Submitted by JOHN HOLST on February 12, 2009 - 7:05am.
Amen, Tom Kelly! You hit the nail on the head, as an Exclusive Buyer's Broker with about 40% of my clients' purchases being foreclosed homes, the government must take accountability for the condition of their inventory. With irate former borrowers leaving the house in less than desirable condition (which should be a 10 year fast-tracked felony conviction, put me on the jury, folks it costs us as taxpayers!) the government backed foreclosures should bring the house back up to neighborhood standards of condition and value.
This would also provide much needed employment in the idle housing contractors that are not building new homes. This would stabilize the neighborhood comp values. This would generate sales with an upswing effect instead of dilution. What's not to like. I agree completely packaged “Fix & Finance”, sign here and you are in to a move-in ready "livable home" (try to get a mortgage on an appraised "not livable" i.e. a house with missing plumbing, furnaces, wiring, etc., then by default that only leaves the investor paying bottom-feeding prices with non-conventional cash to buy these below market houses. Go Tom!
John C. Holst, Jr., Broker / Owner
Third Generation Realtor
EXCLUSIVE BUYER'S BROKER
MetroStar, Realtors
Chesterfield, MO
www.MetroStarUSA.com
Submitted by Sean OToole on February 12, 2009 - 8:45am.
It was common to fix homes before they were listed in the 90's. Securitization has made that more difficult this time around as it is hard to go back and ask bond holders that are already facing significant losses for the money to improve homes. Sure Fannie and Freddie could do it thanks to taxpayer backing, but they really didn't make enough loans in the hardest hit areas to matter.
Note that despite these problems we've seen strong sales of REO homes in many markets as prices have returned to affordable levels. My understanding is that Freddie only has about 8,000 REO assets in California - that could probably be cleared in a just a few months with appropriate pricing.
Those who argue that REO's sell at deep discounts, and fixing them would help bring prices back are simply out of touch. The problem with prices today is not the cleanliness of the property, or perceived value - it is that buyers simply can't afford to pay more. Tried to qualify a buyer lately? If so you know this to be true.
Finally note that Fannie and Freddie already provide the financing for most of the foreclosed property - how is that new?
This is one of those ideas that can't hurt, but in the bigger picture probably doesn't matter much.
Sean O'Toole
Founder / CEO
ForeclosureRadar.com
ForeclosureTruth.com