Study: Real estate search sites produce results

Brokers generate traffic, leads from third-party sources

Inman News®

A real estate technology company and an industry consulting firm report that Yahoo's real estate portal, Trulia, the Google Base classified site and Zillow are among the top third-party sources of online traffic to brokers' property listings in a case study of a multiple listing service region in Nevada.

The case study, conducted by real estate consulting company The WAV Group and published by Threewide Corp., focuses on Threewide's ListHub, a listings syndication tool, and its use by brokers members of the Northern Nevada Regional MLS.

That MLS has about 3,100 subscribers and their access to ListHub allows subscribers to distribute property listings information to any of 21 online property-search sites. Point2, vFlyer and Postlets, are also among the real estate technology companies that offer listings distribution tools for real estate professionals.

Yahoo Real Estate, at realestate.yahoo.com, is the top source of consumer visits to property listings for the MLS's subscribers who use ListHub to distribute listings information to third-party sites, according to the study, accounting for about 32 percent of consumer referrals. Trulia was next with 23 percent, followed by Google classified portal Google Base with 20 percent and Zillow at 12 percent. No other site exceeded a 4 percent share of consumer referrals.

The report notes that these stats may not tell the whole story, though.

"At the MLS level there are a couple more factors that can impact their results. Some listings may potentially be featured or enhanced by the broker or agent, which is not reflected in the reported numbers and which might explain variations in the results. Finally, brokers opt in to each site individually, so some sites receive fewer listings, resulting in fewer consumer visits," the study states.

Yahoo represented the largest portion of lead volume to MLS subscribers using ListHub, accounting for a 40 percent share. Yahoo was followed in this category by Zillow, with a 21 percent share. Trulia and Google Base each had an 8 percent share, and Oodle had a 5 percent share.

"It was interesting to note that Zillow's lead conversion numbers are proportionally higher relative to their referring traffic volume. Not all traffic is the same: some sites attract consumers who are closer to making an actual purchase. This type of information is key to the decision making process by brokers," according to the study, and brokers can view reports to gauge their return on investment.

The report states that the 8,782 listings from NNRMLS members that were distributed to at least one third-party Web site in May 2008 were clicked on a total of 42,264 times that month -- a click means a consumer viewed a property's complete details. That means each of the property listings received an average 4.8 views during the month.

***

What's your opinion? Leave your comments below or send a letter to the editor.

Share with REmessenger

You must login or register to post a comment.

 
Submitted by Joseph Ballarino on September 10, 2008 - 4:57am.

I can definitely confirm that Trulia does a good job of sending us web traffic.

Regards
Joe Ballarino - real estate
Amerivest Realty
Naples Florida

 
Submitted by Gahlord Dewald | Thoughtfaucet on September 10, 2008 - 6:13am.

The paragraph about conversion rate is really important. In the stats I look at I see widely varying degrees of lead quality (as measured by on-site conversion rate) between the various sources.

I have not noticed a pattern of any specific source consistently outperforming another.

G. Dewald | Union Street Media | Internet Marketing Blog for Real Estate

 
Submitted by Jed Lane on September 10, 2008 - 8:41am.

Why do members of local and national associations need 3rd parties to market our listing and services?

Why does the public need to go anywhere other than the local, regional, or national association owned MLS to get information on properties available and sold data?

Why do Realtors need to pay for the converted leads that surface on third party sites? See above.

Jed Lane GRI
Broker, Sales Manager
Star Real Estate Brokerage
http://www.FogCityGuide.com
415.425.9810

 
Submitted by Sam Chapman on September 10, 2008 - 10:30am.

Although these numbers are interesting, these sites generally don't have anything as good as individual agent IDX search pages can have. Information also is often not current. It is a shame that some of these sites appear ahead of individual agents sites in organic search results as top agents sites tend to have more to offer.

Search

Site Austin TX homes.
Blog Austin Real Estate Blog

 
Submitted by Merritt Noel on September 10, 2008 - 7:31pm.

@Sam
Its all about search engine rankings. As well as features features features which brings the above mentioned websites traffic. My biggest pet peeve and the reason I do not spend time on individual IDX sites is that you have to sign up to search. Unfortunately, you have to play the SEO game.

For instance, I am currently ranked #5 and #6 for 'Denver Houses For Sale" on yahoo...unfortunately I took a drop on google this week back to the 30s(but were coming back). And I am only one guy who hasn't spent any money on Search Engine Optimization.

Colorado Real Estate Listings
Search Houses For Rent
Houses For Sale

 
Submitted by David Faudman on September 17, 2008 - 5:04pm.

When people talk about "lead conversion" what exactly do they mean? In my experience as a broker, the only "lead conversion" that matters is somebody who becomes my client and who actually buys or sells a house. Clicking on my site or asking for information does not pay the bills.

David Faudman, CEO
CleanOffer, Inc.
http://blog.cleanoffer.com