First effort to clean up S&L mess misfired

News analysis: Lessons to be learned this time around

Inman News®

Over the weekend, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson sent a financial bailout proposal to the U.S. Congress that gives the Treasury Department broad authority to buy mortgage-related assets.

To calm the markets, step one is announcing a plan and proposing legislation to isolate and liquidate bad mortgages. But execution is the next challenge for the Bush administration, and it is no easy task if the record of our last real estate cleanup -- the savings and loan crisis in the 1980s -- is closely observed.

As many as 1,500 savings and loans went under during the country's last financial and real estate debacle, and the U.S government lost $160 billion. Ultimately, a government-created entity, the Resolution Trust Corp. (RTC), sold off the bad real estate for as little as 10 cents on the dollar.

The overall record of the RTC is considered by most financial historians to have been a good one, but the first couple of years of the cleanup were bogged down in politics that should not be ignored this time around. Plus, the rush to liquidate the real estate, which the government acquired when a series of savings and loans went under with billions of dollars of insured deposits, may not have yielded the government the best return on its investment in the cleanup.

The RTC was not the first organization created to clean up the S&L mess. The first agency was called the Federal Asset Disposition Association, and its first CEO was Roslyn B. Payne, a very savvy San Francisco Bay Area real estate dealmaker with an MBA from Harvard.

After two years on the job, Payne was dumped, FADA was dissolved and the RTC was created, which stalled the emergency program.

At the time, Payne was allegedly the highest-paid executive on the federal payroll, which sparked a controversy even though she technically worked for a private company created by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board. Her salary was $250,000 a year: compare that to the compensation of a series of sacked Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac executives over the last five years.

The payroll controversy covered up deeper issues within FADA. While Payne was attempting to create a fair and competitive structure for letting go of property assets to get the best return for the federal government, some private contractors who wanted more of the disposition work were not happy with her and allegedly pressured the U.S. Congress to dismiss the female executive and kill FADA.

She got beat up by the media for her salary and the speed or care -- depending on how you look at -- that she was taking to sell the assets. Payne once walked off the set of an interview with CBS News.

She also came under political pressure by Congress. At the time, many members of Congress were knee-deep in the financial mess through their association with S&L executives. Who knows what Payne -- known to be tenacious when it comes to details -- might have uncovered in her diligence?

There are lessons to be learned here if political, government and private business leaders take the time to peel back the onion on the story behind the RTC.

***

What's your opinion? Leave your comments below or send a letter to the editor.

Share with REmessenger

You must login or register to post a comment.

 
Submitted by Caterina Platt on September 22, 2008 - 7:31pm.

The title of the article leads one to believe the misfire was due to bad initial policy. As if creating FADA was a mistake when actually, it was a victim of cronyism. Roslyn Payne suffered from that cronyism, as did the American Tax Payer. The cronyism and the illegal goings on in regards to contract awards most definitely has not stopped. Bring her or someone just like her back to run the new RTC. Catherine Austin Fitts perhaps?

What is it we must learn this time around? Make a clean sweep of congress prior to attempting a reconstruction of the system? Personally, that is the only way I see to start. Failed policies and failure to enforce current regulations was a key issue in this system breakdown. This didn't happen in one presidential administration. It's taken several. The S & L crisis was the first warning, and instead of fixing the system, FIRREA among several other 'reforms' merely put a bandaid on the system. The corruption and greed continued to bleed the market and invented new methods over the last 20 years, but it wasn't a new phenomenon by any means.

We can look to many, many politicians in office and industry officials and find unholy alliances in the form of sweet deal legislation, campaign contributions, promotions when there should have been firings, fines when there should have been jail time (Raines/Johnson/Gorelick, etc. How can we trust these same individuals to now craft meaningful reforms and legislation? We even had one (Cuomo) being touted as a potential for the new SEC Chairman. What must John Mc Cain be thinking? Barack Obama has offered no better.

I'm afraid we may have to catch some dolphins in the tuna net, but Congress needs to be swept. Leave no incumbent with more than one term experience in place.

The portfolios in question need to be valued by Tier 2 means at the very least. True and accurate ratings must be made of the assets, and we should not accept any Tier 3 or computer model valuations. That is one of the methods that failed. The rating companies hired to value the portfolios should have impetus to complete their assignments on true and accurate numbers. Any means to pressure or influence the ratings and valuations is a punishable offense.
The American Tax Payer does not need to absorb any more false valuations and inflated assets!!