Treasury eyeing 4.5% mortgages?
Economists question propping up home prices
By Matt Carter, Thursday, December 4, 2008.News that the Treasury Department may use Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's influence on mortgage markets to push interest rates on home loans down to 4.5 percent has raised hopes for a boost in home sales but sparked debate on whether it's wise to prop up housing prices.
The Wall Street Journal reports that the Treasury is considering using Fannie, Freddie and other government-sponsored entities to purchase securities backed by mortgages at a price equivalent to a rate of 4.5 percent.
Treasury officials have not commented, but the Federal Reserve announced a similar program on Nov. 25, saying it would spend $600 billion to buy mortgage-backed securities and debt issued by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae.
The announcement brought down interest rates on conforming loans by about 1 percent and sent mortgage applications soaring (see story).
Each 1 percent reduction in mortgage interest rate gives home buyers about 10 percent more purchasing power. That can not only get buyers off the fence, but also prop up home prices.
Stabilizing prices in markets where foreclosures have created a glut of homes for sale would be good for home builders struggling to clear backlogs of inventory. It's unclear if the Treasury plan would also help borrowers refinance, which would also reduce foreclosures.
In a speech today, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said problems in housing and mortgage markets "have become inextricably intertwined with broader financial and economic developments."
Lenders appear to be on track to initiate 2.25 million foreclosures in 2008, compared with less than 1 million a year before the financial crisis, Bernanke said.
While industry groups like the the National Association of Home Builders and the National Association of Realtors are all in favor of lower mortgage rates, some economists say home prices in some markets need to fall further before they return to affordable levels.
Appearing on Yahoo! Finance Tech Ticker today, economist Nouriel Roubini called the plan reportedly being considered by the Treasury "a direct bailout" of home builders. Roubini said prices need to fall another 15 percent to reach affordable levels.
Before news of the Treasury plan leaked Wednesday, Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic Policy Research, issued a report advocating that Fannie and Freddie stop buying mortgages in markets where house prices continue to be out of line with rents, in order to bring prices down another 20 to 30 percent.
That would put more homeowners underwater -- owing more on their mortgage than their home is worth -- and could lead to more foreclosures. One solution suggested by Baker is to give homeowners who are foreclosed on the right to become long-term renters of their homes.
Baker argues that it's better to get price declines out of the way than to take measures that only prolong the inevitable.
"At the new lower prices, home buyers would be less fearful that there would be a further decline in prices," Baker said. "This should cause many potential home buyers -- who have been waiting for the price decline to stop -- to re-enter the market."
Bringing prices back in line with historical levels "is the most effective way to boost demand in the market and to begin to reduce the record vacancy rate."
Some observers fear that now that news that the Treasury is considering such a plan has leaked, it will hurt home sales because prospective buyers will stay on the sidelines until it is clear whether the government will take further action to bing down mortgage rates.
In theory, Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson could use the second half of the $700 billion troubled asset relief program (TARP) to buy up mortgage-backed securities.
Although the program was created on the premise that it would be used to buy troubled assets, so far Paulson has concentrated on shoring up banks by providing them billions in liquidity in exchange for an ownership stake (see story).
The Treasury Department hasn't embraced another propsal that FDIC chairwoman Sheila Bair says could be undertaken under TARP: partially insure lenders when they agree to modify as many as 2.2 million loans, at a cost of about $24 billion (see story).
The Treasury and Federal Reserve have been taking unprecedented measures to head off a collapse of the financial system that was initially sparked by falling home prices and a rise in foreclosures.
Bernanke said today that in many cases, lenders would be better off modifying borrower's loan terms than foreclosing. They may be missing opportunities to do loan modifications because the sheer volume of delinquent loans has overwhelmed the capacity of many servicers. The process is further complicated because most loans are packaged into securities sold to investors, and the rules governing the investments may discourage servicers from undertaking modifications, the Fed chairman said.
Bernanke said the FDIC plan, which aims to reduce monthly payments to 31 percent of the borrower's income, would standardize the process of restructuring loans, and minimize the government's involvement to when a re-default occurs. The FDIC assumes one in three modified loans would re-default, costing taxpayers $24.4 billion but preventing 1.5 million foreclosures by the end of next year.
Another step to prevent foreclosures might be to bring down the interest rate borrowers will pay under the Hope for Homeowners program, Bernanke said. The program allows delinquent homeowners to refinance into FHA-insured loans when their lender agrees to write off enough loan principal to create some equity for the borrower.
The Hope for Homeowners program hasn't been popular with lenders, and was modified under the same legislation that created the TARP program to reduce the amount of required write-downs on some loans, permit up-front payments to holders of second loans, and allow loan terms of up to 40 years.
Bernanke said the interest rate on the loans is still expected to be "quite high" -- roughly 8 percent. Treasury could bring down the rate by exercising its authority to purchase the securities issued by Ginnie Mae to fund the program, Bernkanke said, if Congress increased the debt ceiling to allow that.
***
What's your opinion? Leave your comments below or send a letter to the editor.
All rights reserved. This content may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this content without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.

You must login or register to post a comment.
Submitted by Gayle Clemens on December 4, 2008 - 3:36pm.
I am annoyed beyond belief with the bailouts for the Financial Giants AIG especially. They are the ones who need a "market correction!" No business can operate on a failed model and survive. We are going to spend this money to rescue these financial groups and most will end up failing anyway.
It is not about market correction or housing prices it is about the consumer mentality that has been so programmed into the average American. I still believe that if any businesses should be supported it should be the small business groups and yes any American manufacturing that we do still have left here on our own shores!
Tighter qualifying for home purchases and tying any borrowed equity from a home back to direct maintenance or improvements to that same property is the “back to the future” concept that needs to be embraced. Homes are not ATM’s. A First time homeowner doesn’t need to have granite counters or stainless appliances to have a secure home. As a REALTOR® I am weary of the fear and false information that our media and other entities push at us. But foreclosures need to stop! Bad things happen to good people, Life happens at a unforeseen rate, stupid catch 22’s that encourage stupid behaviors need to removed (ie: can’t qualify for a loan because not behind in mortgage payments but can’t do a refi because of credit score here comes another foreclosure on the market!) or a person knows they are losing their job so starts to talk (or should I say tries to) their lender knowing they have a loan that will resetting but lender isn’t communicating so hey here comes another foreclosure! These are just two examples. While AIG gets fatter and Countrywide gets bailed hmmm Shame on US.
Meanwhile us entrepreneurs are trying to do market analysis using foreclosures as the price point doesn’t work, markets overloaded with distressed homes brings down markets, appraisals and reduces the revenue for cities, counties, states and the nation. Let’s address the housing problem and plumbers, painters, roofers and car salesman will start making money again.
Submitted by Anne Hensel on December 5, 2008 - 5:14am.
This low interest rate would only be available for new purchases and NOT for refinancing. People right now are in trouble because of the mortgage/ loan they have not because of the ones they will get. The only thing that will help this housing drama is to stop short sales and foreclosures, so the real estate prices can balance out. The 4.5% will not start a mini housing boom as long as people are afraid that prices are still going down. I think the 4.5% rate for new purchases will do more harm than good.
People are struggling to make their payments right now and that are on a 6.something, or even 7.something interest rate right now, will get very upset that they can not refinance for the lower rate, and if they do the numbers, they might just let their home go in short sale
This 4.5% is like a drop in the bucket. We need a big and bold plan to change the housing disaster. Not a drop by drop solution, we need a fire hose.
When I look at the government and they way they deal with this crisis, I see a home seller that is chasing the market. You know, the sellers that list their home 10% over fair market value, and than drop the price 6 by 10% month later, when the market has already gone down another 5%. To win this game we need to stay ahead of the pack, not chase it. We need to act, not react.
I have to stop, it is not even 8 am and I am getting all upset. But just one more point to consider.
Everybody is talking about the “big three” and all the job losses, not only in these companies, but related industries.
What about real Estate? We are only talking about values going down, people not buying, and foreclosures. All that is very bad, but what about the Realtors that loose their jobs (here in Pinellas we have a nearly 50% drop since summer 2005) what about related jobs, appraisers, mortgage brokers, home inspectors, surveyors, title/closing agents, moving companies, contractors, and the list goes on and on and on.
WHERE IS NAR, who is pleading our case in Washington?
Anne Hensel
Broker, ABR, E-PRO, C-CREC, ASR, AHS, TRC, RECS. CSP
South Beaches Real Estate Professionals
727 409 8706 www.Southbeaches.info
Submitted by Ken Smith on December 8, 2008 - 9:22am.
Money is going to be "invested" on attempting to fix the economy either way. With that said I would much rather some of it go towards attempts to fix the housing market then just giving banks our tax dollars directly.
Ken Smith
Buffalo Grove Homes
Barrington Homes
Bartlett Homes
Submitted by Matt Drouin on December 8, 2008 - 12:49pm.
4.5% Interest rates? A great way to sop up excess inventory in an attempt to stabilize home prices and stimilate the economy.
I support it. Details about this measure are included in my recent publication at:
http://www.nyhomesgetsold.com/articles/_for_a_thiry_year_mortgage_-10/
Read it and let me know what you think.
Matt Drouin
Associate Broker
Nothnagle Realtors
Rochester, NY
http://www.nyhomesgetsold.com
Submitted by David Auston on December 9, 2008 - 7:20am.
The 4.5% rate can only help to take buyers off the fence.
Naples Fl homes for sale
Mediterra Naples Homes For Sale
Naples luxury golf homes
Submitted by Christy Leavine on January 18, 2009 - 6:51pm.
I agree that the housing prices need to fall at least another 15 percent. If the market was to level off at this point, the houses are still to high for the majority of people to afford,especially with the current economic situation.
--
I offer free real estate training, allow me to help you find a new job today!
Submitted by Janet Brice on February 3, 2009 - 8:19pm.
You know, the sellers that list their home 10% over fair market value, and than drop the price 6 by 10% month later, when the market has already gone down another 5%. To win this game we need to stay ahead of the pack, not chase it. We need to act, not react.
Bridal Showers
Baby shower Games
Migraine Headache
Submitted by Tim Dries on April 26, 2009 - 1:57pm.
I'm hoping to buy my first home soon but find it too difficult in the current climate. Lowering the mortgage rate seems good news but will surely lead to higher prices?
Tim
Fireplace design ideas