What makes a Realtor good: an answer
From The Notorious R.O.B.
By Notorious R.O.B., Tuesday, May 5, 2009.
Ease of use must include anticipation. The best client service is proactive. It anticipates the client's need and addresses it, often making recommendations. One of the best salesmen at Bergdorf Goodman Men I worked with would go find a suit for the customer, but at the same time pick out a couple of shirt and tie combinations that matched that suit perfectly. Then he would ask the customer how the rest of his wardrobe worked with the suit the customer had just selected. More than half the time, the customer would want to see what the salesman had in mind. (It didn't hurt that this was an extremely effective way to cross-sell merchandise.) In real estate, anticipation can take many forms. Perhaps the buyer client was looking for homes in a good school district -- anticipate her need and ask if she'd like to do a short tour of the local elementary school. If you know that a client is going to ask for something, don't make the client ask; just do it for her.
Lastly, but not least, ease of use encompasses delivering the result the client is seeking, or at least helping the client understand why that result was not achieved. If what the client wants is not something you can deliver, and won't change his mind even after you've explained, then ease of use dictates that you send the client somewhere else.
What about skills?
In the original post, a number of commentators spoke about things like market knowledge, technical skills (such as knowing the law, doing paperwork, negotiation), and the like. Surely what makes a Realtor good includes some measurement of the craft of brokerage?
It does. But not to the extent one might imagine, and perhaps not for the reasons one might imagine.
The technical skills and market knowledge are critical, of course, but ... a Realtor who doesn't possess these basics could hardly be considered a professional at all. Issues of client service can hardly enter the picture if the Realtor in question doesn't know local market conditions and can't negotiate her way out of a paper bag. We are better off considering such individuals as Realtor larvae, as we think of first-year law associates to be lawyer larvae.
As a rule of thumb, may I propose that a Realtor whose technical skills and knowledge can be matched by a consumer who spends a day on Google looking up information, data, and the real estate process needs more basic training? Or to find some other line of work.
Competing on ease of use
I believe that ease of use is the perfect grounds for competition. It is easy to understand, obvious to the client, and easier to differentiate than the alternatives.
Consider something like "market knowledge." There is no real way for the consumer to judge whether one Realtor has more market knowledge than another unless the consumer himself is an expert in local market conditions. Negotiating skill is another thing the consumer can't possibly judge without sitting in on a bunch of negotiations by a bunch of Realtors.
But the frequency and quality of communication is something the consumer can judge. Whether one Realtor takes the time to explain the advice whereas another one doesn't, or does a worse job, is something the consumer can judge based on his own understanding of the advice and issues after having it explained. "Joe made that really clear, but Jane not so much."
The consumer, after interviewing a few different agents, can decide whether one agent gives him a greater feeling of peace of mind.
That's great, but how?
I'm not really sure. I have ideas that I plan to explore in future posts, since the whole insight was new to me as well.
Offhand, however, it occurs to me that most Realtors and brokerages focus most of their investment into getting more eyeballs on listings. There's a lot more energy spent on thinking about random visitors from Google than there is on people who have entrusted their biggest asset to the agent. That might be a place to start.
I've got things to think about. What about you?
Originally posted at Notorious ROB, Copyright (c) 2009 Robert Hahn
***
What's your opinion? Leave your comments below or send a letter to the editor.

All rights reserved. This content may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this content without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.

You must login or register to post a comment.
Submitted by Tim O'Keefe on May 5, 2009 - 8:34am.
A good agent is only determined by the final result and is reserved for the sole opinion of the client. And the definition of a good agent has to include ones sales numbers lest we forget this a business.
As I once read in the flat fee book, A LA Carte, a homeowner answered an informal survey on service. "Good service is selling my house". The rest is only opinion.
Of course the experience during that that selling process is important. However, often forgotten is that they still do not necessarily care about that as much as they do getting moved into their next home.
Tim O'Keefe
Real Estate SEO-Online Marketing
http://www.houseblogger.com
http://www.spiderworkz.com
Submitted by Kathy Judy on May 5, 2009 - 9:05am.
Once again an Inman News column hits it right on. I'm sharing this with our agents and request that you repost it to ActiveRain. We all need to read this.
Submitted by Kristin Noll-Marsh on May 5, 2009 - 2:05pm.
Thought-provoking commentary. Coming from a service background, where good communication was critical, I see how it makes a difference to the consumer. Imagine a world where real estate agents tell their clients, "I'm not advertising on craigslist. I don't syndicate your listing to other web sites. I don't enhance on Realtor.com. I don't use high-quality photography. I don't make floor plans. I don't use video. I don't know how to text message. I've only had 3 transactions my whole career. I don't email blast your listing to cobrokers. And I don't have my own web site."
Communication is great, but seller's won't know what some agents AREN'T telling them.
I do, also, take issue with "Realtor" being used in this article, generically, to mean "real estate professional." My profession is not "Realtor." That is my professional association and membership sets me apart from non-Realtor members. Unless you assume all Inman.com members are Realtors and clients would only hire Realtors.
http://bestmilwaukeehomes.com
http://blog.bestmilwaukeehomes.com
Submitted by Jay Zenner on May 5, 2009 - 4:20pm.
This is a very interesting topic. My own feeling is that there are really two different professions embodied in the concept of a REALTOR. Both share some technical skills but the job of a listing agent is much different than that of a buyer agent. This distinction wasn't as important during boom times but in a buyers market, the marketing skills necessary to serve a listing client are much more akin to a marketing director while the buyer agents are more like the rep networks in the gift industry. During boom times sophisticated marketing for listings isn't terribly necessary, so virtually all the training that agents got in marketing was about getting leads or marketing themselves. So, in my humble opinion, there are two relevant questions, what makes a good listing agent and what makes a good buyer agent.
Submitted by Ron Redlich on May 14, 2009 - 10:54am.
A good Realtor asks for the business and then listens to the response.
warehouse space warehouses warehouse for sale warehouses for sale warehouse for lease