Everyone is No. 1?

The Wheel Estate Cam, Episode 3

Episode 3: Frank Borges LLosa of FranklyRealty.com in Arlington, Va., talks about the numbers game some agents play in describing how they rank among other agents. It's common to hear agents describe themselves as No. 1, LLosa said, though because so many agents use the "No. 1" to market themselves it has diluted the value of such statements.

LLosa suggests a uniform way to measure agents against one another: how much money they actually take home rather than the number of sales or total dollar value of homes sold.

***

What's your opinion? Leave your comments below or send a letter to the editor.

 

You must login or register to post a comment.

 
Submitted by on November 13, 2009 - 6:52pm.

Debra Sinick, GRI,CRS
Windermere Real Estate/East,Inc.
Kirkland, WA
425-260-3219

www.eastsiderealestatebuzz.com
www.debrasinick.com

So do my clients care whether I'm #1 in sales volume, my 1099 or if I'm putting them as #1 with my knowledge, service, advocacy, and integrity?

 
Submitted by Aspen real estate on November 15, 2009 - 1:20pm.

The best agent for you doesn't necessarily work at the largest brokerage, close the most transactions or make the most money. The best agent for you is an experienced professional who will listen to you, conduct herself in an ethical manner and knows your market.

[http://www.example.com 4]
[url=http://www.google.com]5[/url]
[url=http://www.google.com/[/url]
real life

 
Submitted by on November 16, 2009 - 7:57pm.

Frank...Love the Wheel-estate cam!! (Although I do need Deamamine before each episode).

I'm not sure I'm ready to determine #1 status by 1099 income alone. I know plenty of brokers who make a living by discounting their fees (and service) and dominating their market share. Their 1099 looks terrific...but most of their clients would never use them again! I think we need a system where customers can rate their agents...sort of an "Epinions for Real Estate". Let the consumers decide who is best. More transparency is better than any "#1 award"

 
Submitted by on November 20, 2009 - 7:48pm.

Thanks Hal,
Maybe a discussion about rating agents is good for an upcoming topic.

Those ratings can be easily manipulated, so I'm not sure that will be the best way to know "good" from "bad."

Also my #1 proposal, wasn't for the best agent, but for the agent that makes the most money.

Frank