Agents not ready to share transaction history?
HAR.com pulls down agent-search tool showing sales, listings activity
By Matt Carter, Thursday, July 15, 2010.SAN FRANCISCO -- If consumers want to know who the most active real estate agents in a given market are, somebody will eventually deliver that information to them -- but for now, at least, it's looking like it won't be the agents' multiple listing services.
That's the perspective of Bob Hale, CEO for the Houston Association of Realtors, after HAR was forced to pull the plug on a map-based tool for consumers that allowed them to see which agents had the most transactions and listings in a particular ZIP code or neighborhood.
Just days after launching its "Realtor Match" tool in April, a deluge of angry calls from Realtors forced HAR to reverse course and take down some of the tool's capabilities, Hale told fellow MLS executives and others attending the Real Estate Connect conference in San Francisco this week.
Consumers can still see "Agent Ratings" of one to five stars bestowed by past clients, and agents can also choose to make MLS data showing their past transactions available on their profile page.
But consumers are no longer directed from the HAR.com site to view Realtor Match's "market activity" search tool, which allowed them to see a list of Realtors and the number of transactions or listings represented by each agent in a given area.
"We hadn't sold (the benefits of the platform)" to the association's 23,000 members, Hale said of the complaints that flooded in after Realtor Match launched. "This is going to happen, but we're not going to be the ones to do it."
Some HAR members who spoke to Inman News when Realtor Match launched said they were worried that it might make it more difficult for them to win business in a neighborhood "owned" by a few agents. New agents worried that a lack of transaction history or listings would put them at a disadvantage.
HAR attempted to address such concerns by having Realtor Match rank "market activity" search results by the most recent transaction or listing, rather than the greatest number of transactions or listings. But a quick glance at the search results would still reveal which agents were the most active in a particular area.
Other Realtor associations may still be able implement the Realtor Match tool, because the project was funded by a "Game Changers" grant from the National Association of Realtors.
When HAR launched Realtor Match, NAR CEO Dale Stinton said the association's "experience in publishing this data will be measured and evaluated. If the program is a success, all other associations will have the groundwork laid out for them to do something similar."
Russ Bergeron, CEO of Chicago-based MLS, Midwest Real Estate Data LLC, said MLSs "are going to have trouble pulling something like this off." Realtor associations, which typically own MLSs, need members -- even those who haven't done a transaction in months and would rather not have that fact known to the world.
Justin LaJoie, the chief executive officer of Diverse Solutions, a company that is ready to analyze MLS listings data to help consumers compare agents, said he continues to struggle with fears about transparency.
In a competition for software developers at last year's Connect Conference, LaJoie's company created an automated system for rating real estate professionals based on MLS data on past transactions.
"We're going into this knowing this will probably never see the light of day," LaJoie said at the time.
Speaking on a panel with Hale at this year's conference titled "Naked Crunch: Radical Transparency and MLS Data," LaJoie said the initial reaction to the company's prototype application, Agent Scouting Report, "was very exciting -- MLSs loved it."
But a month or two later, he said, "they were scared, because they were nervous what agents were going to think. There was no way we could do it without MLS participation."
Diverse Solutions was named as one of two winners of last year's "Connect Create" developers challenge. HAR's Realtor Match tool won an Innovator Award at this year's Connect conference.
LaJoie said agents may not realize that if consumers are provided access to a rich set of statistics, they will evaluate it in many different ways that depend on their personal criteria.
Consumers' evaluations of statistics "can go either way depending on who's looking at them and what they're looking for," LaJoie said.
One seller may be looking for agents who have a history of selling properties with the fewest days on market, while another may be more concerned with getting the highest possible price.
As for client reviews, good agents have nothing to fear, and agents who receive negative reviews can use them to identify areas where they might improve, LaJoie said.
"The agent rating has gone over really well at HAR -- we haven't gotten any push-back on that at all," Hale said. "Agent productively is the one everybody got a little nervous about."
Among the 49 percent of consumers who have responded to e-mails inviting them to rate agents after a transaction, the average rating has been 4.92 out of five stars, he said. Agents must either opt in or opt out of the agent-rating program -- they can't pick and choose the ratings they want the public to see.
"It took about three days to create the software to do agent ratings," Hale said. "it took about a year of meetings with brokers, managers and agents to develop the business rules."
Hale still thinks consumers will get access to transactional history, and that "it will happen outside of the industry, and everybody will be mad."
He noted that one site, NeighborCity.com, already offers past and current listing data "for every agent in Houston ... and I guarantee not a single agent knows they are up there."
The NeighborCity website is operated by a brokerage that obtains MLS data in markets in California, Georgia, Texas, Utah, Colorado and New York to rank agents based on their transaction history and number of active listings. NeighborCity matches the property type and price range of homes agents typically work with to users' search criteria.
Realtor.com, which is currently receiving data on sold listings from MLSs in about 50 markets, is beta-testing new capabilities that allow consumers to see the selling price of properties and view who represented both the buyer and seller.
Unless agents instruct Realtor.com to suppress such information, agents' profile pages show the number of active listings they have and the average listing price.
| Contact Matt Carter: | |||
All rights reserved. This content may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this content without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.

You must login or register to post a comment.
Submitted by John Rowles on July 16, 2010 - 5:12am.
This is exactly why MLSs should stay out of the consumer-facing Web site business -- they simply don't work for consumers, they work for brokers and agents.
As noted in this article, it is just a matter of time before someone provides this valuable information, because there are more consumers than agents, and the competition to get those consumers provides the incentive to serve their needs first.
It just won't be done in an environment where agents get a veto.
Submitted by Ruthmarie Hicks on July 16, 2010 - 2:24pm.
One could very much argue that this type of system only favors the status quo. One of the biggest problems I see is agents taking over a small area and making a different model - no matter how beneficial to gain "legs."
On the other side, are the misleading ads by Zillow calling people area "experts" when they have no knowledge of the area at all. So the public facing site actually made the problem WORSE by trying to get agents to pony up. And let's face it, the public doesn't want to pay for what they have had for free.
Submitted by Brian Wilson on July 17, 2010 - 6:46am.
I agree with you John. I don't know any other professional association in the country whose members think it is a great idea to do this. It's strange that some in our industry think it backward-thinking to not want this.
Submitted by Brian Wilson on July 17, 2010 - 6:47am.
My question is this: If Bob Hale knows his agents do not want this information published on a public-facing site and was forced to remove it from HAR.com, then why is HAR allowing Neighborcity to do the same thing with his member's data?
Submitted by Ken Lampton on July 17, 2010 - 8:27am.
The REALTORĀ® Associations are fighting for market share. The larger associations have enough money to engage in "innovations" like HAR's Realtor Match program, the smaller assocations do not. And so the smaller associations start to think it makes sense to fold up shop and merge into the larger associations. That's just what the large associations want.
The question is this: In their zeal to burnish their reputations through "innovation" have the large associations lost track of their mandate to serve the best interests of their members?
It appears many REALTORSĀ® in Houston felt the HAR went too far with Realtor Match. I'm glad they were able to have a say so.
Submitted by Ted Jernigan on July 18, 2010 - 5:27pm.
I recently found NeighborCity listing properties my group had sold over the past few years as active. We had a small rash of phone calls from consumers wanting to see these sold properties. A friend also had a client whose property she had just listed call her to ask why their property was on this site as an active listing at a price they had paid for the property two years ago. This was not the price the property is being marketed for today. The client was extremely unhappy. Calls to the company's phone bank seem to reveal that their real business is selling leads to real estate agents.
I am in favor of new business models for the realestate industry. I would be interested to know what contribution to the conduct of business this kind of activity makes?
Ted Jernigan
Ebby Halliday REALTORS
McKinney, Texas 75071
www.teamjernigan.com
972-489-6173
Submitted by Jason Lopez on July 22, 2010 - 2:09pm.
I agree this is not the best way for an MLS to serve it's members. However, as a brokerage it may not be a bad idea. We have seen the impact publically displayed rankings have had, so think how this tool could drive more customers to a firm's best agents! At the end of the day that's what it's about...connecting customers with the most productive agents to increase conversion.
Jason Lopez
CA Real Estate Broker
License# 01180851
twitter: @jaylopez
http://www.facebook.com/jasonklopez
Submitted by Ben Nicolas on December 3, 2010 - 1:26pm.
I do not necessarily have a problem with this as long as it could be applied evenly across the board for every job in America. What do you do for a living? Is there a publicly accessible website where you are rated against all the other business analyst II's (for example) in your company/zip code/county that you would be willing to share with your boss on a monthly basis to give them an opportunity to decide who they were going to hire next month? What about a portal for agents that ranked all the buyers in the area based on how much money they had in the bank, their credit score, monthly income and their past history in terms of what % of list price they typically offer?
M. Ben Nicolas
IET Real Estate
www.ietrealestate.com
Submitted by Lori Blank on September 30, 2011 - 2:05pm.
I pay MLS dues as a designated Broker and feel our MLS should not allow this VOW, REDFIN, to publically post INCORRECT information about us and our agents.