Find a new plan for appraisal reform

Letter to the Editor

Inman News

Re: 'Bill would suspend new appraisal rules' (June 29)

Dear Editor:

Some are saying the Home Valuation Code of Conduct (HVCC) is a good policy and that it is improving our industry. Some go farther and claim that the National Association of Realtors and NAMB are fighting HVCC because they can no longer "influence" unethical appraisers. I, however, am not one of these people.

HVCC is wrong. It ... was not subject to normal transparent conventions associated with regulation or legislation. The code is the result of an investigation that has yet to have its findings released and has all the trappings of a backdoor deal to prevent a massive lawsuit and promote a personal agenda.

The implementation of HVCC has brought lower values, but that is not the issue. The implementation has produced bad methodology. There are numerous reports of appraisers using unrealistic comps -- using single-family-residential, planned-unit-development homes for a custom-construction, gated-community sale, etc. Recently, I received a complaint of a property coming in 20 percent below contract price ($300,000), and comps for outside of the historical district were the bulk of the report. Four weeks later and with another buyer, the value came in 5 percent above the same contract price and comps were reflective of the neighborhood.

Consumers are now financially tied to lenders and it is difficult to transfer loans and therefore harder to hold lenders accountable for their pricing and service. The code does specify that transferring appraisals is acceptable, but in reality it is not happening. One large national lender will only use appraisals if they are ordered from their wholly owned subsidiary appraisal management company.

That same lender will only transfer appraisals out if they have declined or counteroffered the loan. So if they want the borrower's loan they will not transfer the report and the customer will have to absorb the cost of new appraisal.

I am not against mortgage reform and am willing to work on a system that reduces fraud and coercion, but HVCC is fraught with mistakes from its inception to its implementation. Congress needs to enact the moratorium and allow a sensible plan to be implemented as part of the overall reform of the financial industry.

Tom Heath
Mortgage professional
Tucson, Ariz.

***

What's your opinion? Leave your comments below or send a letter to the editor.

You must login or register to post a comment.

 
Submitted by Bruce Hahn on July 18, 2009 - 4:50am.

It is becoming apparent that there are problems with the implementation of HVCC. I’m sure the authors did not intend for it to lead to the use of appraisers unfamiliar with the local market or the use of comps that were inappropriate because of their geographic location or for other reasons.
It does not necessarily follow that it needs to be repealed. HVCC’s original purpose was good, and now that some of the implementation problems have been identified they can be addressed through the regulatory process or through legislative action that will assure independence and transparency and thoughtful and effective methodology.
Reasonable people should support that approach and offer suggestions to achieve that objective. It is not necessary to return to the system where fraud and coercion were all too common.

Bruce Hahn
President
American Homeowners Grassroots Alliance and
the American Homeowners Foundation

 
Submitted by Jerry Hoffman on July 19, 2009 - 5:51pm.

Appraisal reform was never needed.... not in the 80's and not now. LENDING REFORM and control of lenders is what is needed.

Fraud and coercion cannot be legislated away.

Our current problems in real estate have nothing to do with appraisals. "Values" went up because of demand. Appraisers accounted for the demand. The demand was created by the lenders...period, exclamation, end of story.

The idealism of the HVCC is admirable, but as with most knee jerk reactions, it creates more problems and solves none.

Go back to appraisal guidelines in place before the bottom fell out; return to lending guidelines that were practical and reasonable and insured borrows would not be over extended, as opposed to guidelines that allowed lenders to make a loan (profit) regardless of the borrowers realistic ability to meet the obligation; then you will return to a rational market with sustainable growth.

Jerry Hoffman
RE/MAX Territory
Elk Grove Village, IL