Why consumer confidence is key to recovery

Strong housing market depends on more than election

Inman News®

I don't know what was more exasperating: the number of commercials during recent sporting events telecasts or the fact that most of the paid interruptions were approved by political candidates. Can the pace possibly slow before November?

What we know for sure is that there will be a different person in the Oval Office, and many people believe that will most likely benefit housing. According to a study commissioned by Move Inc. and conducted by Harris Interactive, 44 percent of the population believes the housing market will improve when the new U.S. president takes over.

Because housing is cyclical, that's a fairly safe bet. (We are at least two years into a decline after a long upswing and the new president conceivably could have eight years to get it done). Some markets will take longer to recover, however, especially those in south Florida, southern Nevada, California's San Joaquin Valley and Phoenix-Scottsdale, Ariz.

"Consumer confidence tends to rise whenever there is regime change in Washington, and this should be especially true in 2009," according to John Tuccillo, former chief economist of the National Association of Realtors and one of the housing industry's leading analysts. "For housing, however, the current downturn needs to run its course. Some markets will improve before the election, some after and some not until the end of 2009."

The Harris survey indicates a strong underlying demand for homeownership. Nearly half (41 percent) of current homeowners plan to purchase a home again, while 80 percent of renters intend to buy a home at some point in the future, with 47 percent planning a purchase within the next five years. More people will do so for space-related (26 percent) and life-stage-change reasons (17 percent), such as having children or downsizing to a smaller residence.

Most home buyers are willing to make substantial sacrifices to save and earn extra income for down payments, and will compromise on features and amenities to acquire an affordable home, the survey revealed. Many of their choices may reflect changing values, including a growing concern over the environment, the importance of community features and the rising cost of fuel.

About four out of five home buyers say they face barriers to buying a home in the current market. The greatest single barrier is high home prices, a concern that was much higher in the West than in the South or Midwest.

Affordability is not just about prices -- it is significantly influenced by interest rates. What is curious is the misguided notion that mortgage interest rates never rise during an election year. In reality, for the past 40 years, the chances of interest rates declining during a presidential election year have been poor. While there are fluctuations depending on the type of loan and the terms and the month the loan was written, the truth is that mortgage rates tend to go up more often than they go down during presidential election years. In the last 10 presidential election years, the interest rates tied to the 10-year Treasury-bond rate went up seven times and dropped three times (by less than a half-percentage point).

Thomas French, former president of the Mortgage Bankers Association of America and a man who steered clear of ambiguous, middle-of-the-road statements, told me before the 1988 election: "I don't think anything as puny as a political party or candidate can move mortgage rates in this world. They may hope, but it won't happen."

Most home loans are now sold as long-term securities on the international market to a variety of investors. They, not local bankers, now control long-term interest rates. In a capsule, things are so much more complex and different today. Local bankers no longer dominate the financial landscapes they serve. For example, years ago when the corner banker had plenty of cash in deposits, he typically lent money at a cheaper rate. Now, there's a definite international influence.

If the Saudis decide to hold down the price of oil, it will affect what you pay at the pump -- and probably what you pay for a home mortgage. This move typically has nothing to do with a specific political party in the United States. Even the Federal Reserve Board doesn't have the long-term power to keep rates down like it once did. It does react to harness and stimulate the economy as it sees fit, but other countries now have to cooperate.

Tuccillo pointed out that the United States pulled out of recessions in 1993 and 2001 when the White House welcomed new occupants. He believes the "election economic bump" indicators will begin to surface soon because the autumn consumer confidence figures are expected in the next several weeks.

"Both candidates are offering economic programs that will expand the role of the federal government and thereby stimulate the economy," Tuccillo said. "The Obama platform appears to be a shade better in that it would help redress the maldistribution of income that has handicapped the middle class. Most of the McCain program is a continuation of the Bush economic policy."

Perception can move economic mountains. If Americans feel good about the economy and the future, a housing resurgence could easily follow -- regardless of who becomes president.

To get even more valuable advice from Tom, visit his Second Home Center.

***

What's your opinion? Leave your comments below or send a letter to the editor. To contact the writer, click the byline at the top of the story.

Share with REmessenger

You must login or register to post a comment.

 
Submitted by Stephen R Snyder on September 24, 2008 - 2:09pm.

Steve Snyder
C M G Mortgage Services
925-287-2236
www.SFBayAreaLoans.Com

Let's look at this with an eye on simplicity so there can be a clear picture. First of all, the demand needs to be there to purchase a home. The supply is certainly there. So what is missing?

Take it to basics. In the world of merchandising, when Macy*s can't sell an exisiting inventory in their store, what do they do? Over advertise, promote? And what else? Make it affordable for the consumer to see the value. And then Macy*s lowers the price or in that world, "Takes a mark-down" in price of the product. Understanding all things are not considered equal when comparing a major economy with department store retailers. However, it is still product, homes, that need to be sold.

While the values have come down, rates are not horrible! Why the still stagnet market. I don't understand that inflation can be a worry if Mr Bernanke lowers cost of funds further because I lack the financial level of education to grasp it. However, If we closed our eyes, lowered the selling prices, lowered the current rates further, and the "media" would say to the consumer, it is a good time to buy, I would bet that consumer buying would take off and move the market. Or at least the investor market that has lead us out of cycles over and over throughout history. Then there is the old saying, "We can make it up in volume."

In February when Mr. Bernanke gave us lower cost of funds on a suprise meeting on a Sunday night, Monday and Tuesday until noon the phones were off the hook and loans were made like crazy. By eleven o'clock Tuesday, we had received a second and some third price changes for the worse and by one pm it was over becasue lenders raised their rates for the third time that day. Being told that they had to "slow" down the inflow of orders becasue they did not have the overhead to handle the in-flow or loan orders, we all thought the banks would higher more help and then lower rates again to be in line witrh the new cost of funds and we would be having a great spring. But they never lowered the rates back to be in line wirth the cost of funds only to be very slightly raising them through spring until now. Yes we have a few dips down and up again but never back to the level that corresonded to the cost of funds drop on the February Winter Morning. So we stagnated through spring, summer and now fall is upon us.

With the cost of funds is still at that low point and rates still higher, are the banks trying to make larger margins to cover some of their losses they have incurred in the last year thinking they will grow at the same time? If this is the case, then I think they are dreaming. With the cost of funds very low, I think the banks alone, the ones that are left, could generate the housing market WITHOUT the government needing billions of tax payers dollars to fix something they encouraged lenders to relax guidelines in the first place. Banks, take the rates down to the level that will generate the "value" the consumer is looking for. The rates in the first week of February for a loan under $417.0 was for that glorious thirty six hours was in the neighborhood of 5.25%.

 
Submitted by Wenceslao Fernandez Jr, BS, Realtor, CDPE on September 26, 2008 - 9:32am.

The issues we are seeing are of increadible proportions. As simple as they seem, they are extremely complex and will affect every man, woman and child in America, and in my opinion, around the planet, for years to come.

Our image of being financial capital of the world is now in jeopardy. All investment banking firms have ceased to exist in America and our largest insurer as well.

The fact that the fed funds rate is lower or that it could go down to zero is of little consequence if capital contines to suffer and be frozen and the credit markets don't reignite.

When it comes down to it, there will be no inter-bank lending, no capital to loan to anyone anything from the simple lunch paid with a credit card to payroll.

Our government (both sides), got us here and both sides of our government must get us out. The revitalization of our world financial systems must begin with Wall Street, because the hold control of every financial instrument that keeps our country and by default, the world spinning.

The freeing of these capital markets will allow us to visit an ATM machine and not find out that it is dry and help us avert what I feel will be the biggest recession or even, depression our planet has ever seen.

Restoring our (and every country's) confidence in capital markets is the only way out, backed of course, by a big investment (not a hand-out) of close to $1Trillion, whithout which, receivables financing, payroll, credit cards, auto loans, import-export trade financing, student loans and everything else that represents any form of borrowing at a corporate or individual level would simply, destroy every aspect of capitalism and democracy we hold dear.

ww.MiamiRealEstateKing.com
Certified Distressed Property Expert
Miami-Dade County, Florida.