DEAR BARRY: I’ve been a home inspector for more than 10 years and have had some ethical challenges. On a few occasions, agents have asked me to "omit" information from a report to help secure a loan and close the deal. The very idea of this offends me. By omitting disclosures from a report, I would compromise my integrity and the credibility of my profession, all for the sake of future referrals.

My job is to provide genuine disclosure to homebuyers. If I actually miss something during an inspection and learn about it later, I hire a licensed professional to repair the problem. Because of this policy, I have never been sued or even threatened with a lawsuit. Besides that, I sleep well at night. Your thoughts on this would be appreciated. –Larry

DEAR LARRY: The agents who ask you to compromise your reports are more transparent in their dishonesty than the few "bad apples" I’ve worked with. I recall suggestive comments such as, "Hey Barry, this deal is really important to me, so I need a ‘really good’ report." Taking them at their word, I gave them the best (i.e., most complete) report that I could. Before long, I became known as the "deal killer" and received no more referrals from those "bottom-feeders."

The good agents who routinely recommend me — the ones with integrity, who believe in total disclosure — tell me of the unhappy reactions of listing agents who learn that I am scheduled to do the inspection. "Oh no! Not Barry! He’ll kill the deal!"

Show Comments Hide Comments


Sign up for Inman’s Morning Headlines
What you need to know to start your day with all the latest industry developments
Thank you for subscribing to Morning Headlines.
Back to top