Dear Barry,

Since buying our home, we’ve learned that another buyer nearly bought it about six months ago. That person hired a home inspector, and copies of the report were given to the sellers and their agent. But nothing was mentioned about the report when we bought the property, and we want to know if they were required to disclose the information in that report. –Betty

Dear Betty,

Disclosure issues can be simple or complicated, straightforward or convoluted, depending on the views and practices of those involved in the transaction of real estate. A process that should require little explanation is somehow plagued with entanglements and uncertainties. There seem to be no limits to the variant questions arising from divergent disclosure practices. Yet, at the root of all disclosure controversies, there is one common underlying question: How can a person know what to disclose and what not to disclose? Fortunately, the answer is plain and simple: Disclose all that you know, without exception, without compromise. When in doubt, disclose. The worst that can happen when everything is disclosed is that another buyer might have to be found. On the other hand, the consequences of abridged disclosure may include financial loss, needless litigation, and in the very worst cases, injury or death due to undisclosed safety problems.

With this criteria in mind, one needn’t ask whether the contents of an old home inspection report should have been disclosed. In your case, the sellers and their agent were aware of whatever particular defects were revealed by that report. If they chose not to provide a copy of the report itself, they were definitely required to divulge every defective condition listed in that report. Failure to do so would constitute deliberate concealment of known property defect, and in most states that is a violation of the law. If you have concerns regarding possible nondisclosure, you should demand to see a copy of the old report.

Hopefully, you hired a home inspector of your own before buying your home. If your inspector was qualified, experienced and conducted a thorough review of the property, you should already be aware of whatever significant defects were disclosed in the previous report.

Dear Barry,

Are home inspections required by law when houses are sold, or are they optional for home buyers? –Andy

Dear Andy,

At this time, no states have made home inspections a legal requirement. Professional property inspections are available to home buyers at their own discretion, as an elective means of consumer protection; as a proactive way to practice the age old caveat: buyer beware. When performed by a truly qualified inspector, they provide the best preemptive defense against negative surprised after the sale. The benefits of a competent inspection serve the needs of all parties in a real estate transaction, by reducing the likelihood of conflicts after the sale. State requirements to protect a home buyer’s financial interests should not be necessary. Buyers should have the prudence to do this for themselves.

To write to Barry please visit


Send a Letter to the Editor for publication.
Send a comment or news tip to our newsroom.
Please include the headline of the story.

Show Comments Hide Comments


Sign up for Inman’s Morning Headlines
What you need to know to start your day with all the latest industry developments
Thank you for subscribing to Morning Headlines.
Back to top
Leaders from across the industry answered our call to come to Inman Connect and share essential advice for leveling up your 2021.SEE THE SPEAKERS×
Up-to-the-minute news and interviews in your inbox, ticket discounts for Inman events and more
1-Step CheckoutPay with a credit card
By continuing, you agree to Inman’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

You will be charged . Your subscription will automatically renew for on . For more details on our payment terms and how to cancel, click here.

Interested in a group subscription?
Finish setting up your subscription