Risk of 'second Depression' fades
Commentary: Recovery on hold for troubled housing markets
By Lou Barnes, Friday, May 8, 2009.
Flickr photo by preciouskhyatt.First, the miracle of loaves and fishes: Economic optimism and immense deficits combined to blow up the Treasury market, but mortgage rates have held in the fours.
The 10-year T-note had traded deeply in the twos since Thanksgiving, never above 3.02 percent, and yesterday spiked to 3.36 percent. With mortgages in the high fours, the spread to the 10-year is as narrow as ever, half last summer's, held only by the Fed's promise to buy another trillion worth of mortgage-backed securities in the remainder of this year.
If the economy really has entered a "V" bottom to recovery, not even the Fed can hold mortgages here. However, that "V" resides in the minds of a small but very loud minority. Ask passersby on a sidewalk, and you'll not find anybody in that group.
On the positive side, the sensible center has correctly concluded that the risk of a second Depression has faded, hence the withdrawal of panic bids from Treasurys.
The new data do show a moderation in economic contraction. Net of revisions, April payrolls shrank by 539,000 vs. the 699,000 lost in March, and new claims for unemployment insurance slid 34,000 last week to 601,000, the lowest since January. However, this gentling is not bottom: The unemployment rose another 0.4 percent to 8.9 percent.
There is a great deal of stimulus in action. The Fed's rate will stay at zero, which will tend to anchor long-term interest rates despite the Treasury deficit. Some energy-price decline will soon reverse (oil is pushing $60 per barrel), but the overall decline is still in place. Tax credits and rebates began to arrive in envelopes two months ago, and federal money has offset lost revenue at states and cities, preventing deep cuts in spending. The Fed's "quantitative easing" -- printing money to buy $1.55 trillion in MBS and government securities -- is providing credit that the financial markets cannot.
Negative forces are at least as great. The wealth effect running in reverse has demoralized every diligent household. Honest economic estimates overseas give the lie to help from a global rebound: Germany now estimates a 6 percent gross domestic product decline this year, and Eurozone officials expect no recovery until the second half of 2010.
Troubled housing markets here are not stabilizing -- although not sinking as Case-Shiller and Zillow have it. Three housing roadblocks: strong households now knocked over by job loss; the millions of households trapped by big negative equity, who will gradually lose faith and discipline and walk; and mortgage credit so restrictive that it has completely offset the drop in rates. Purchase applications for loans still have not increased, and there will be no bottom until they do. Credit, credit, credit. …
The stress tests deserve some congratulations. Getting inside the bankers' kimonos to conduct a future cash-flow valuation of toxic assets: good work. The dinky $75 billion in new capital required (versus $5 trillion in banking assets at the "Big 19") is legitimate good news, although much compressed by banks' ability to earn new capital with the widest-ever spreads between cost of money and interest charged to borrowers.
However, the object of the exercise is credit. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke warned that recovery would abort if the "financial system relapsed." Question, sir: How could anyone tell? The Fed's own survey of bank credit terms in April showed "only" 40 percent of banks tightened terms -- and not one single bank eased ... 0-for-8,000.
Consumer credit outstanding in March contracted by $11 billion, the sharpest pace since 1943 (not a big domestic-consumption year). Certainly, some of that pay down is voluntary and healthy, but more is circular. Fear of an inability to borrow pushes households into no-consumption bunkers.
The principal clarity from the stress tests: Hoping for a restoration of banks as public utilities? Shouldn't have bothered. Business as usual.
Bank of America's Ken Lewis said yesterday, "Our game plan is designed to help get the government out of our bank as quickly as possible." I'm sure he didn't mean the FDIC guarantee of deposits. (My guess: He thinks that's his, not ours.)
Lou Barnes is a mortgage broker and nationally syndicated columnist based in Boulder, Colo. He can be reached at lbarnes@boulderwest.com.
***
What's your opinion? Leave your comments below or send a letter to the editor. To contact the writer, click the byline at the top of the story.
All rights reserved. This article may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.
You must login or register to post a comment.
Submitted by chis eliopoulos on May 8, 2009 - 12:48pm.
What would it take for anyone to see the picture and understand, why all these efforts with the "stimulus"are not working.The feds and the "experts" are keep talking about "credit".The question is -credit from were-?Most of the banks are BANKRUPT or near bankrupt, with very few prospects of raising capital, (I want to see how many people would buy BofA stock),and they use the money from the stimulus to buy other bankrupt banks (Chase/Washington Mutual).I think the whole thing is a joke and I would had a good laugh if I wasn't paying against my will for all this mess.I do not believe a word the feds or the "official agencies" are saying, as a matter of fact every time I read an announcement/news I can help thinking how much is going to cost me.I will care less if all the banks close tomorrow,or the Wall street becomes history,or if the real estate market looses more or all its value.I just don't want to have to pay for bailing any of the above out.
We are a capitalistic society.The markets will take care of them selves.All we hear is a tactic to intimidate us and go along with the "big game"
This is a great opportunity to purchase real estate and get the terms one wants from bank financing.If the banks are playing difficult providing financing,there many other ways to replace them.Many people have and they keep purchasing real estate at great prices with out paying much attention to the doom and gloom of the economic news.Those are the people that five years from now will be cashing in.
Submitted by Jon Astaris on May 8, 2009 - 7:39pm.
Had the banks been left to paddle for themselves as they did in the 80's and 90's they'd get rid of their nonperforming gunk on the quick. They'd hire enough disposers and shove the garbage down the pipes fast because otherwise FDIC or whoever it was in those days would show up with boards and nails.
These days the banks know uncle Ben and uncle Tim and uncle Obama will show up with a bag of money and say PUHLEEESE take this!!!
It's the guvmint who's bringing down the curtain on this once great nation, and it's doing it with smoke and mirrors. 'tis the beauty killed the beast, only here it's in reverse...