Mortgage bankers find fault with appraisal rules
Fannie, Freddie plan to implement new standards Jan. 1
By Inman News, Thursday, May 1, 2008.Bookmarking Sites
The Mortgage Bankers Association is calling on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to back out of agreements with New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo that would create a code of conduct for home appraisals.
The agreements, also signed by federal regulators that oversee the government-sponsored enterprises, were intended to insulate appraisers from pressure to inflate home valuations.
But by barring lenders from relying on in-house appraisals or those performed by affiliated businesses, the code of conduct would actually reduce oversight and accountability for much of the appraisal industry, the MBA argues.
Furthermore, the industry and public had no opportunity to comment on the agreements with Fannie and Freddie or the code of conduct before they were announced on March 3, the trade association said.
After the agreements were announced, Fannie and Freddie said they would take public comments until April 30.
With a compliance date of Jan. 1, 2009, only eight months away, the MBA called on federal regulators to reopen the process of drafting an agreement, or institute changes recommended by the industry.
The agreements with Fannie and Freddie were the product of Cuomo's investigation into the packaging of mortgage loans into securities sold to Wall Street investors.
New York sued First American Corp. and its subsidiary eAppraiseIT last fall, claiming the companies bowed to pressure from Washington Mutual to inflate property appraisals. WaMu was not named in the suit, and all three companies have denied any wrongdoing.
Under the agreement, lenders that want to sell loans to Fannie and Freddie would be prohibited from relying on in-house appraisal reports or appraisals performed by affiliated appraisal management companies.
Although lenders could authorize appraisal management companies and correspondent lenders to select appraisers, they would not be allowed to rely on reports from appraisers selected by other third parties, such as mortgage brokers and real estate agents.
In signing on to the agreements, OFHEO Director James Lockhart said they were built upon existing federal and state laws and regulations, and "should help restore confidence in the mortgage market by enhancing underwriting practices, reducing mortgage fraud and making home valuations more reliable."
In a letter to the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight and executives at Fannie and Freddie, MBA Chairman Kieran Quinn said the MBA recognizes that appraisers are subject to "significant pressure by various actors in the mortgage process such as borrowers, real estate agents, mortgage brokers and sometimes even commissioned employees of lenders."
But lenders have an interest in obtaining accurate appraisals, as they can lose money on loans that go bad because of inflated valuations whether they hold their loans for investment or sell them to secondary market investors, because they are usually forced to buy back fraudulent loans from investors.
"These potential losses give lenders a strong incentive to avoid overvaluation of the property that serves as security for loans that they originate," the MBA said. "By contrast, few if any appraisers have the capital to make good on defaults caused by an erroneous or deliberately misleading appraisal."
Current regulations subject the in-house appraisal departments of federally chartered financial institutions to periodic examinations by regulators.
"Under the code (of conduct), this supervisory oversight would be eliminated," Quinn said in his letter. "As a consequence, financial institutions would be required to rely on appraisers with limited accountability, comparatively little or no capital or net worth requirements, or even regular examinations. The code (of conduct) would, in effect, significantly reduce oversight and accountability for much of the appraisal industry, a result that would seem contrary to the (New York attorney general's) objectives."
Although the code would apply only to loans eligible for purchase by Fannie and Freddie, loan originators have modeled their underwriting standards for nonconforming loans on those used by the government-sponsored enterprises because they are accepted by secondary market investors, the MBA said.
The MBA advocates modifying the code to allow the use of in-house and affiliate appraisers if they are in compliance with appraisal regulations and guidelines issued by federal banking agencies. The MBA said it could also endorse a requirement that staff appraisers and affiliated companies be financially independent from loan production staff.
***
What's your opinion? Leave your comments below or send a letter to the editor.
All rights reserved. This article may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.

Add A Comment
You must login or register to post a comment.
Submitted by Gary Crabtree on May 1, 2008 - 1:39pm.
HVCC needs to be modified. The real culprits in this mess is the AMC's who farm appraisals to the "lowest bidder" instead of the most experienced and competent. With borrowers paying $350-$400 for the appraisal and appraisers being paid $125-265 for the appraisal the profit center is with the AMC's. As an experienced and designated appraiser for 46 years, I can't afford to work for $25.00 per hour (before taxes)- especially when I just paid $3.899 a gallon for gas. I would have to do two appraisals per month just to pay for my gas.
Beam me up Scotty......
Submitted by Barry Noble on May 1, 2008 - 3:16pm.
HVCC: The idea was commendable - the rsultant so called "Code" is a nighmare. HVCC needs to be reviewed and notably changed. Already major banks are bypassing the use of competent appraisers for multiple broker opinions of value, for which they are not paying a dime - but dangling the chance to represent some of the future short sale or foreclosure sales - and by doing so they are indicating to the broker/agents what value they expect and if the opinions are not within 10% the agent can be blacklisted from future opinions and thus listing jobs. This is criminal. And no where in the HVCC going to govern broker opinions or the misuse therof. If competent appraisers are put out of business - the next debacle will make this current terrible mess seem a molehill against a volcano. The public, the home owners and the competent appraisers who really do protect them, must all themselves be protected, not put out of business. I am proud of my work and cannot believe I'll have to change professions because of so shoddy an agreement. Also, a review of the AMC's on the internet might reveal not only will they be stealing 1/3 to 1/2 of the appraiser's fees just for referring them, but their relationships or ownerships may be questionably tied to the major banks.
Submitted by James Haro on May 5, 2008 - 7:33am.
Fortunately form me I am a licensed Real Estate Broker. I can return to selling real estate.
When the new regulations for appraisals are implemented, my mortgage business of 21 years will wither away because my costs to borrowers will be uncertain and my ability to guarantee a mortgage rate will be very limited. Why? If I can not order an appraisal from a competent appraiser that I can send to any lender, then my borrowers will be forced to pay for multiple appraisals from different lenders.
If the lender I choose to lock and submit a loan to picks a poor quality appraiser or picks an appraisal firm where the appraiser, based upon the desires of the employing lender, will tend to under value refinanced properties. This undervaluing will be to protect the lender, not serve the borrower as the Attorney General of New York implies. Some lender appraisers will be more converative than others. The consumer will then suffer because I will have to shop the loan to other lenders and the borrower will have to pay for a new appraisal. I will have to lock loans in at multiple lenders to protect my borrowers loan terms. Lenders will then have to plan for a larger fall out on locked loans or try to charge either up front fees to lock a loan or a penalty for not delivering a loan. Otherwise, the lenders will have to raise the costs to borrowers whose loan applications are successful to pay for the failed loans.
The value of real estate WILL DECLINE EVEN MORE when this policy is implemented. Home equity will decline even more severely than it has to date. I am planning to SELL all of my personal real estate now because the value will be substantially less after these new regulations are implemented.
Submitted by M C on May 6, 2008 - 5:08am.
Well said James Haro. The most interesting part of these unintended consequences (as is usually the case when politicians/regulators seek headlines) there was never any study on inflated appraisals as a cause and effect of current marketplace. More importantly, the big national companies the likes of which the NY AG went after will still be doing the same thing; bilking the consumer with no consequences for bad appraisals and making a fee on each appraisal ordered--as you identified there will be many more for the consumer to pay for with each investor having to order an appraisal. It is just as unethical for appraisers to undervalue a property as it is for them to overvalue a property. Where is the outrage for the consumer. NONE ZIP ZERO. Just an inefficient system hurting sellers and buyers as contracts blow up due to delays in appraisals being ordered and reordered. Consumer cost most certainly rise and big corporations profits will rise.