More loan servicers resorting to auctions
REO inventory quadrupled in two years
By Inman News, Wednesday, May 21, 2008.Bookmarking Sites
Six out of 10 loan servicers are resorting to auctioning off real-estate owned properties, despite evidence that they may see bigger losses than if foreclosed homes are marketed and sold in a more traditional fashion, according to a report by Fitch Ratings.
Inventories of real-estate owned (REO) properties more than quadrupled from the end of 2005 to the end of 2007, Fitch analysts said. To get properties off their books and reduce long-term carrying costs, more servicers are resorting to auctions, the report found.
"Fitch believes that the use of auctions will continue to increase as servicers are faced with growing REO inventories and increasing loss severities," the report said.
Although loss severities are typically higher when properties are auctioned off instead of listed and marketed to home buyers, there may be cases when taking an up-front loss at an auction is preferable to taking the time to market a property, the report concluded.
Auctions can be the best option for vacant properties in distressed geographical areas that are vulnerable to vandalism, and for homes in poor condition that require expensive repairs. Home in areas already saturated with REO properties may also be good candidates for auction, the report said.
Loan servicers surveyed by Fitch reported higher loss severities on properties sold at auction compared to those that were traditionally marketed.
But the cost of maintaining and managing swollen REO inventories for longer periods is decreasing recoveries and increasing loss severities when they are finally liquidated, Fitch analysts said.
Loss severities on subprime loans averaged 52 percent for the 12-month period ending in February 2008, the report said, up from 41 percent in 2005.
Loan servicers surveyed by Fitch said they believe home prices in declining markets will not begin to level off or reverse until the volume of REO properties available for sale in those areas returns to more historical levels.
Several of those surveyed "indicated that they believe the sooner servicers are able to work through the current and anticipated REO inventories, the more likely property values in these neighborhoods will start to rebound."
Many of the loan servicers that use auctions said they expect to use them more frequently in the future, and among the 40 percent who were not using auctions, several were exploring the possibility.
Fitch analysts said that while some servicers carefully select properties best suited for auction, others use more informal selection processes such as length of time in REO inventory, which may not produce the best return.
The report recommended that loan servicers perform property-by-property analyses to compare expected loss severities if a property is marketed through traditional means instead of auctioned off. Such evaluations should include property condition, property value, geographic concentrations, competing market values, and the history of auctions in the area, Fitch analysts said.
The report recommended that if loan servicers are resorting to auctions for the first time and don't have information to compare projected loss severities, they should use traditional sales methods with a control group of properties to see how the results compare to auctions.
***
What's your opinion? Leave your comments below or send a letter to the editor.
All rights reserved. This article may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.

Add A Comment
You must login or register to post a comment.
Submitted by Peter Contostavlos on May 21, 2008 - 3:41pm.
If the loan servicers are willing to accept greater potential losses through the auction process, then why are they being so hardnosed when they receive the same prices through the traditional process? I have had many experiences on REO properties they have countered or rejected what should have been seen as a fair offer for a few thousand dollars more. The loan servicers could move more properties and faster using the traditional approach if they got more involved in setting the initial prices up front with the listing agent. If they are willing to take a lower than market price they should just offer the home at what they will accept. Advertise it as "No Haggle" "Bottom Line" pricing. In this way they should be able to avoid the risky auction process and move the current inventory faster.
Submitted by Stan Barkley on May 22, 2008 - 7:18am.
The article completely ignores a large cost to the note holder and that is the lost revenue from the money invested in the property. The note holder is better off getting the property off the books and getting the money back in circulation.
Submitted by John Davison on May 22, 2008 - 10:03am.
I couldn't agree more with the previous two posts. As fas as I'm concerned, if the lenders are too stupid to work more assertively in the beginning stages of the process, then they are getting what they deserve in the auction process.
I wish someone could explain to me one thing:
Assuming the bank/lender is not willing to modify a loan to the economic satisfaction of the borrower and the home goes into pre-foreclosure, why then doesn't the lender/bank perform a BPO and establish a market price that the Realtor can go to market with in hopes of drawing a offer that they now know will satisfy the lender/bank, since they were the ones who established the asking price in the first place?
If the process unfolded like this we could avoid: (1)low-ball listing prices designed to solicit offers, and (2) loss of countless months waiting to obtain an offer on a listing while the foreclosure clock ticks away on the seller.
Pre-foreclosure listing prices need to be established up front by the lenders/banks so we Realtors could market properties with the confidence that a full price offer would get the deal done and avoid foreclosure for the homeowner.
Submitted by Bufford Warren on May 23, 2008 - 11:33am.
Having to dispose of these properties at auction and for less money is deserved by the lenders. When an offer is sent to a lender it takes way to much time to recieve an answer. I have one that we are now closing after three and one half months and the offer was at current appraised value. Another one was cancelled after waiting 6 weeks and still not haveing an answer. On another the bank would not accept CDs as the buyer having the cash to close, the buyer had to cash the CDs and deposit them into their checking account before they would accept the offer. These are just a few examples the problems faced by Realtors and their buyers. I know of Realtors that will not even write an offer on a short sale because of not being able to get the lien holder to respond. The lenders need to put in place a set of guide lines that will give their employees the authority to negotiate these transactions in a timley manner, then they would not have to resort to taking less value at auction.
Bufford Warren
Broker
Metro West Realty
Phoenix, AZ
t