Wells makes play for Wachovia
Citi protests agreement announced today
By Inman News, Friday, October 3, 2008.Wells Fargo & Co. is the new suitor for Wachovia Corp., today announcing a merger agreement worth about $15.1 billion -- but Citigroup Inc., the financial services company that had planned to buy Wachovia in a deal announced Monday, is crying foul.
The Wells-Wachovia announcement is the latest in a series of power plays in the financial industry that have created a handful of mega banks -- the moves were largely precipitated by the one-two punch of exposure to bad loans and the credit crunch.
Under the Wells-Wachovia agreement, Wells Fargo would acquire all outstanding shares of common stock for Wachovia in a stock-for-stock transaction and will acquire all of Wachovia's businesses, equity, debts and banking deposits. Wells reported that the deal was unanimously approved by boards for both companies.
The deal will not require any financial assistance from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. or any other government agency, Wells Fargo announced.
But Citi is claiming, in a statement posted at the company's Web site today, that Wachovia had no right to shop for another buyer.
"Wachovia's agreement to a transaction with Wells Fargo is in clear breach of an exclusivity agreement between Citi and Wachovia," according to the announcement, which also charges that Wells Fargo is interfering with that agreement.
"The ... agreement provides, among other things, that Wachovia will not enter into any transaction with any party other than Citi, and will not participate in any discussions or negotiations with any third party," according to the statement.
Citi "has demanded that Wachovia and Wells Fargo terminate and not proceed with any proposed transaction."
Last week, JP Morgan Chase announced an acquisition of Washington Mutual Bank to form a mortgage-lending powerhouse that rivals Bank of America, which has acquired Countrywide Financial Corp. (see Inman News). Bank of America and Countrywide had a combined $92.9 billion in residential mortgage originations in the second quarter, compared with $69.8 billion by JP Morgan and WaMu during that quarter. Wells Fargo had $63 billion in originations in the second quarter and Citi had $28.5 million.
Wells Fargo had assets of $609 billion and deposits of $339 billion as of June 30, and Wachovia had $812 billion in assets and $448 billion in deposits, according to the Wells Fargo announcement.
The combined company will have community banks in 39 states and in Washington, D.C., and will reportedly rank first in deposit market share in 17 of those states.
***
What's your opinion? Leave your comments below or send a letter to the editor.
All rights reserved. This content may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this content without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.

You must login or register to post a comment.
Submitted by DeWayne Davis on October 3, 2008 - 9:57am.
This is another item which the public needs to get the facts to avoid the fear that will generally follow.
Submitted by Commercial Mortgage Loans - Privately Funded - MasterPlan Capital LLC on October 5, 2008 - 12:10pm.
I would think that the government will stand by Citi on this one, even though it’s better for the taxpayer if the FDIC is not involved. It the regulators just let Wells step in and scoop up the deal they will lose credibility with banks and make it much harder to craft a deal when the next take-out needs to happen.
MasterPlan Capital LLC - Simple, 1 Page Commercial Mortgage Application; Online at: www.masterplancapital.com
Submitted by Jack Kloskowski on October 5, 2008 - 6:28pm.
This will be quite interesting. Since this is judical battle, it will be decided in court. The decision rests between Citi's "exclusivity agreement" (legally binding contracts must be honored) and "greater good" of the shareholders as a result of "superior bid" from Wells Fargo. Now Wachovia is asking federal judge to overrule state court and allow for merger with Wells Fargo.
I'd say with Wachovia support for Wells Fargo merger, it would depend on judge's personality: Citibank wins - "consertartist judge" ("pacta sund servanda" - Latin "agreements must be kept") versus "liberal judge" ("greater good", "superior bid" etc.)
But the question is what would become of Wells Fargo after swallowing toxic Wachovia (Option One and Vertice mortgages!) for 8 times the size of Citi bid - another "to big to fail" bank? Maybe this is the idea in the first place?
_________________
Mortgage Helpline