No money back for remorseful buyers

Editor's note: This article is reposted with permission by The Real Deal. Click here to view the original article.

By LUIS F. PEREZ

A federal appellate court decision last month has strengthened the hand of developers as they fight thousands of lawsuits across the country from condominium unit buyers trying to get out of contracts signed during the boom.

A December analysis by The Real Deal showed that hundreds of buyers in New York were trying to use a federal disclosure law called the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act, or ILSA, to renege on their contracts.

New York saw its first ILSA ruling in decades when a federal judge ruled in January that the developers of the Harlem condo Fifth on the Park were exempt from the ILSA statute, thereby rejecting two buyers' efforts to break their contracts and get their deposits back. The buyers said they planned to appeal that decision.

Just days after the New York ruling, the Atlanta-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit sided with the developer in another ILSA case in Bonita Springs, Fla.

That Feb. 3 ruling doesn't bind other federal jurisdictions, but it sets a precedent other federal courts are likely to follow, experts said. It's the second ILSA ruling the same appellate court has made in the last six months siding with the developers .

"The vast majority of ILSA cases are in the 11th Circuit," said Martin Schwartz, a partner in the real estate practice group at Miami-based law firm Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod.

The 11th Circuit has a lot more experience in this area of the law since it covers Florida, which has been at the forefront of the real estate bust, he said. So the other circuits and lower courts are likely to look at its decisions for guidance, said Schwartz, who represents developers but hasn't been involved in any of the lawsuits decided by the federal appeals court.

The disclosure law requires developers dividing land into 100 or more parcels to provide the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development with a property report. The law also requires them to provide buyers with the report before signing contracts.

The 1968 law was intended to protect out-of-state consumers from being duped into buying worthless swamps in Florida or tracts of desert land in Arizona. In the 1970s, the law was formally extended to apply to condo developers. ...CONTINUED

All rights reserved. This content may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this content without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.