This week was more about human nature than economics and markets.
When Fukushima looked catastrophic, the fearful bought Treasurys and 10-year yields fell to 3.15 percent from 3.55 percent in six days, taking mortgages to 4.75 percent.
Since Japan is now merely awful, the stock market drunks are back in charge, fright-money coming out of bonds and rates rising on the happy thought of war with Libya. Go figure.
In the U.S. economy, little has changed. A spurt in manufacturing activity has the blind watchers of traditional patterns buzzing, and for once they may be right: It is possible that the U.S. competitive gap with the world is closing.
As for the rest of the economy … the Fed’s post-meeting statement said the "recovery is on firmer footing." Fair enough. No footing is firmer than flat ground, and stripped of revisions that’s what the new-data trend was: core consumer price index, industrial production, starts and permits for new homes, mortgage applications, unemployment claims … all flat.
The Fukushima story began without the benefit of competent media. Anybody with history compulsion, let alone nuclear obsessive-compulsive disorder, knew Saturday morning that seawater injection and hydrogen explosion meant meltdown.
CNN for the next four days chopped off any nuclear expert in the first sentence and went back to footage of crying babies and the tsunami. Monday’s markets were quiet; not until Tuesday morning trading in Asia did the "nuclear glow" dawn, and the Nikkei crashed 15 percent in five minutes.
I did not find the first capable TV account until Tuesday evening — on MSNBC’s "The Rachel Maddow Show," of all productions.
Compounding the media weakness is the historical inability of Japanese institutions to pass negative news from the field to leadership, and these guys are taking top trophy from Michael DeWayne "Brownie" Brown, the former leader of the Federal Emergency Management Agency who took a fall amid the Katrina wreckage.
Every bit as bad: The determined optimism near stock markets, an astounding number of analysts claiming that rebuilding will be good for Japan and the global economy.
All that you need to know: If not one CH-47 pilot could hover for the 15 seconds necessary to dump a bucket on target … that place is hot. However, that hard radiation is not moving: There is no Chernobyl graphite-fire volcano to move it.
Long-term contamination will move, perhaps not in human-harmful doses to the public; yet, possibly enough strontium and cesium to make plants and grazing animals inedible for a long time, in a large area.
In terms of scale, Russia’s land area is 6,592,800 square miles. All of Japan is 145,903 square miles. The Chernobyl exclusion zone is 3,560 square miles. Fukushima’s extent cannot be known now, but don’t expect to find anybody on a beach towel near there for a long time.
Follow the money. Japan’s finances are the weakest of all large nations — in John Mauldin’s observation, "a bug in search of a windshield." Debt is 200 percent of gross domestic product, and going higher. Windshield found. Japan’s deepest financial problem is demography.
It is one of the oldest of all nations, vaunted savings rate dropping to zero, and its population five years ago began to shrink outright. In the last week or so, prospects for immigration there have not improved, nor for conception.
In post-catastrophe we all tend to fall into counter-panic, desperate to prevent recurrence. Ban nuclear power altogether, when resistance to new-build is responsible for the hazards of so many overage plants?
Embrace the rising price and environmental damage of fossil fuel, or the impoverishing mega-cost of renewables?
Rebuild … what? The towns on Honshu’s north shore lie on compact river deltas, the mountains beside them perfect magnifiers of tsunami. Rebuild only above this apocalyptic high-water mark? Or live behind new 100-foot-high sea walls? How quaint. Lovely.
Build for another 9.0? Or figure you’ve taken the once-a-millennium shot and build (again) for a 7.9? Or for a 9.5?
Leadership everywhere, not just Japan, constantly fails to look around corners, freezes in emergencies, and then overreacts once it’s all over.
Yet the individual collective keeps moving, goes to work, tends kids, brushes off, smiles, and looks to a better day. I could draw an allegory to a mortgage and housing meltdown, but … nah.
Lou Barnes is a mortgage broker and nationally syndicated columnist based in Boulder, Colo. He can be reached at email@example.com.
|Contact Lou Barnes:|
|Letter to the Editor|