First-time buyer credit not a cure-all
Qualifying for mortgage is the real test
By Steve Bergsman, Friday, June 19, 2009.A few weeks ago, I was taking the van service from my hotel in Manhattan to Newark Airport. It was early in the morning and the driver was listening to a talk show. I was half asleep and wasn't paying much attention to the squawking except at commercial breaks when I kept hearing advertisements from a local mortgage company about first-time homebuyer tax credits.
The reason my thought processes kept waking up at the commercials was that:
1. It was such anomaly. There was a time, in the middle of this decade, when we probably heard nothing but commercials from mortgage companies, but that was at least two years ago. With the collapse of the housing market and, to some extent, many of the country's largest mortgage firms, we enjoyed mostly silence on the airwaves about residential lending.
2. Why would a mortgage company run ads about the tax credit, since credits really had nothing to do with getting a mortgage?
The $787 billion stimulus bill President Obama signed into law earlier this year included an $8,000 tax credit for first-time homebuyers. There is a time limit on this offer; the sale of the home must close between Jan. 1, 2009 and Dec. 1, 2009.
Now, a tax credit will not help anyone get into a new home. It comes at the very end of the home-buying process; it is put into place after all the paperwork has long been completed. Months later when it's time to do your taxes for 2008 (or for 2009), you fill out the appropriate forms if you haven't done so already, and then weeks later, you open your mailbox to find -- depending on your tax situation -- a refund check from the U.S. government.
(First-time homebuyers may be able to sell their anticipated tax credit or obtain a loan against it that can be used toward their down payment. The Federal Housing Administration issued guidelines in May allowing FHA-approved lenders, nonprofits and government agencies to purchase the tax credits. In most cases, the tax credit can't be used to meet the FHA's 3.5 percent minimum down-payment requirement. Down-payment assistance loans offered by some state housing finance agencies are an exception.)
How does this work?
The tax credit is a refundable credit, which means that if you pay less than $8,000 in federal income tax, the government will send you a check for the difference. If you owe $4,000 in federal taxes, your payment to the Internal Revenue Service would be nil, plus you would get a $4,000 payment from the government. What happens if you didn't owe any money to the federal government and instead were expecting a $2,000 refund? That's even better because the refund would grow to $10,000 once the tax credit gets added into the mix.
While it's a great deal for the homebuyer, I was curious, if the tax credit was included in a "stimulus" bill, why wouldn't the government incite buyers to acquire homes with actual mortgage help at the beginning of the process. ...CONTINUED
All rights reserved. This article may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.


You must login or register to post a comment.
Submitted by Robert A. Hulme on June 19, 2009 - 5:43am.
The $8,000 tax credit has been motivating hundreds of First-Time Home Buyers to enter the Housing market in my area. Utah also has offered a $6,000 Grant for the home buyer who purchases a home that hasn't been lived in.
Both of these factors have really helped the Housing Market in Utah to get back on track.
Robert A. Hulme
Realtor, GRI, e-PRO
Utah Select Realty
Loan Officer
Mortgage Xpress
www.ProvoOremHomes.com
www.PrideInProvo.com
Submitted by Matt Sicignano on June 19, 2009 - 11:55am.
I want to point out the "stimulus" part of the tax credit. Its true that it won't help anyone get into a home but it will motivate finacially savvy people to get off the fence and do something! That in and of itself will create urgency in the market place. No sense in getting more unqualified people into a home they'll walk away from because they have no investment made. Remember the tax breaks that hybrid vehicles received early on-they accomplished their purpose-get the early adopters on board, reward them for being decisive, then when the masses (relatively speaking) jumped in, remove the incentive.
Definition of stimulus: something that incites to action or exertion or quickens action, feeling, thought, etc.!!!
Submitted by Rich Johnson on June 19, 2009 - 5:11pm.
Hate to be the fly in the ointment but the reason we are in the mess we are in is that we allowed people to buy homes that couldn't afford in the first place. Seems to me that a case could be made that we are headed right back the same road we were on a few years ago.
Rich Johnson
360-319-3267
http://www.johnsonteamrealestate.com
http://www.johnsonteamrealestate.com/blog/
htty://www.twitter.com/richjohnson1944
Submitted by Jerzy (George) Szkup on June 19, 2009 - 9:38pm.
George Szkup
www.DestinationTucson.biz
Steve,
I do not understand an ending sentence in your Blog - "If you bought a home prior to 2004 and aren't investigating the marketplace this year, you are missing a huge opportunity."
What does buying a home before 2004 has to do with "opportunity"?
George in Tucson
http://www.DestinationTucson.biz