In 1924, the Storek family purchased the three-story Storek office building in San Francisco. In 1969, son Glenn Storek bought a 50 percent interest in the building from family members. After Glenn’s father died, the other half of the building was owned by two family trusts.

In 1976, S&S Environmental, a Storek family enterprise, borrowed $186,364 from the Storek Building Fund, which was then controlled by Glenn and his father. From 1978 to 2005, widow Lorraine Storek was the trustee of both trusts. In 1986, Glenn borrowed $595,000 from Embarcadero Mortgage Co., using the Storek building as collateral.

Purchase Bob Bruss reports online.

In 2005, Glenn’s brothers Craig and Richard took over as trustees of one of the trusts. They purportedly discovered “malfeasance and wrongdoing” by Glenn. Craig, Richard and Lorraine, who is now 92, filed a state court lawsuit against Glenn.

However, in 1991 Glenn had filed Chapter 7 bankruptcy. He was discharged of his debts at that time.

At Glenn’s request, in 2005 the U.S. Bankruptcy Court reopened his case because, he alleges, the lawsuit by his brothers and mother violates his 1992 bankruptcy court discharge. Brothers Craig and Richard allege Glenn concealed his wrongdoing for decades.

If you were the judge would you rule Glenn’s 1992 bankruptcy discharge included the “malfeasance and wrongdoing” alleged in the 2005 lawsuit against him?

The judge said yes!

The 2005 lawsuit against Glenn by Craig, Richard and Lorraine is essentially based on their same claims in his 1992 bankruptcy discharge, the judge explained.

“Litigating this family feud, which smacks of posturing in order to be better positioned for inheritance when the family matriarch dies, would be the province of the state courts except that Glenn had filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition in early 1991 and the case had been converted to Chapter 7 later that year,” he continued.

Because this issue was already litigated in Glenn’s 1992 bankruptcy discharge, an injunction shall be issued barring further state court lawsuits on the discharged claim and assessing attorney fees against Lorraine, Craig and Richard, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court judge ruled.

Based on the 2007 U.S. Bankruptcy Court decision in In re Storek, 355 B.R. 187.

(For more information on Bob Bruss publications, visit his
Real Estate Center
).

Show Comments Hide Comments

Comments

Sign up for Inman’s Morning Headlines
What you need to know to start your day with all the latest industry developments
Success!
Thank you for subscribing to Morning Headlines.
Back to top
The Connect Expo: Explore the Latest Business ToolsCHECK IT OUT×
Log in
If you created your account with Google or Facebook
Don't have an account?
Forgot your password?
No Problem

Simply enter the email address you used to create your account and click "Reset Password". You will receive additional instructions via email.

Forgot your username? If so please contact customer support at (510) 658-9252

Password Reset Confirmation

Password Reset Instructions have been sent to

Subscribe to The Weekender
Get the week's leading headlines delivered straight to your inbox.
Top headlines from around the real estate industry. Breaking news as it happens.
15 stories covering tech, special reports, video and opinion.
Unique features from hacker profiles to portal watch and video interviews.
Unique features from hacker profiles to portal watch and video interviews.
It looks like you’re already a Select Member!
To subscribe to exclusive newsletters, visit your email preferences in the account settings.
Up-to-the-minute news and interviews in your inbox, ticket discounts for Inman events and more
1-Step CheckoutPay with a credit card
By continuing, you agree to Inman’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

You will be charged . Your subscription will automatically renew for on . For more details on our payment terms and how to cancel, click here.

Interested in a group subscription?
Finish setting up your subscription