" ‘Stranger and stranger,’ said Alice," and so it was this week at the Federal Reserve, in Europe, and in President Obama’s State of the Union address.

Some brave souls thought the Fed would surprise by rolling out "QE3," a third round of quantitative easing, and begin to buy more mortgage-backed securities, driving mortgage rates down. Everyone expected a pair of meaningless inside-Fed jokes (more transparency, and an inflation target), and we got those.

" ‘Stranger and stranger,’ said Alice," and so it was this week at the Federal Reserve, in Europe, and in President Obama’s State of the Union address.

Some brave souls thought the Fed would surprise by rolling out "QE3," a third round of quantitative easing, and begin to buy more mortgage-backed securities, driving mortgage rates down. Everyone expected a pair of meaningless inside-Fed jokes (more transparency, and an inflation target), and we got those.

Nobody expected this: to extend the Fed’s zero-percent rate from 2013 to the end of 2014.

Bonds have rallied, with 10-year Treasurys back down to 1.92 percent and mortgages close to 4 percent, and markets still adjusting.

Bernanke’s term expires a year before the end of the new zero-rate period! 2014 is so far off in the economic future that nobody can know its conditions, but you can bet — bet a lot — that the Fed would make a three-year commitment only if it is seriously worried.

That anxiety has penetrated even the stock market, which has sold off for the first time in years after a new easing by the Fed. The Fed’s concern was justified by today’s weaker-than-it-looks fourth-quarter U.S. gross domestic product report.

In Europe, the European Central Bank will not allow a bank to fail. Those dominoes are off the table. The ECB may or may not play the ultimate card, buying or second-stage monetizing "Club Med" nations’ wallpaper, but banks will not be the trigger for ultimate euro collapse.

However, the underlying disaster is still rolling along. Christine LaGarde, French minister of finance until last summer, and now managing director of the International Monetary Fund, this week delivered a speech worthy of the White Queen in "Alice in Wonderland": "Why, sometimes I’ve believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast."

In grand French style, her speech so important, so without consequence: demand European growth measures simultaneous with cutting spending and raising taxes; a larger financial firewall but no source for the money; and deeper integration among cultures farther apart every day. Banks not in play, European economies will determine the next stage there.

"The state of the union is getting stronger." Uh-huh. Fifteen hours and 15 minutes after President Obama spoke those words, the Fed announced an economy in such peril that its previously unprecedented aid would extend over the horizon.

OK, all presidents have the right to use lipstick. However, 40 minutes and 58 paragraphs into his words, words and words, the president first mentioned "homeowner."

He gave it three sentences to describe a refinancing proposal that does not exist and will not. Three weeks after the Fed chairman, a Fed white paper, and four other Fed governors and regional presidents identified housing as the most serious risk to the economy, why it is, and what to do about it … three empty sentences in the State of the Union address.

The 12th and 69th paragraphs (only) contained the word "deficit" in self-congratulation for last year’s painful minicut. Nowhere in the speech was a reference to a domestic spending cut or planned spending discipline of any kind.

We are entering the second year of an inert White House. Blame the tea party, rightly, but a second year with no meaningful, congressional-passable economic proposal? At all? When in modern times has the White House been so dormant?

Franklin Delano Roosevelt was active, heaven knows. Some still argue about what he did, but not that he tried with mighty invention.

Harry Truman let no grass grow in a deadly time and with a hostile Congress. "Ike" knew how to use staff better than anybody; it got him time for golf, but he got stuff done, and ornery Democrat Sam Rayburn ran Congress.

John F. Kennedy’s two years had questionable result, but action! Statues of Lyndon B. Johnson would be common had he not become entangled in Vietnam, as any president might have in 1965.

Odd, brilliant Richard Nixon was plenty productive until the last six months, and never had a Republican Congress.

Gerald R. Ford restored faith and fought inflation. Jimmy Carter never connected, and micromanaged his way to oblivion, but was anything but asleep.

Anything Ronald Reagan got done in eight years had to be negotiated with Tip O’Neil.

George Bush (the elder) faced nothing but Democrats, and Bill Clinton had to make deals with Newt Gingrich.

These last 11 years … I find no parallel except the emptiness of Warren G. Harding and Calvin Coolidge. Heck, even Herbert Hoover tried hard.

Fourth-quarter GDP arrived plus 2.8 percent, but consumer spending rose only 2 percent (after all that media jive through the holidays), and the savings rate fell below 4 percent, leaving little slack in household budgets.

Inventory rebuilding aside, GDP rose only 0.8 percent, and that was boosted by an improbable 10.9 percent jump in residential construction, likely to be revised closer to the 1.3 percent third-quarter gain.

Chart courtesy of calculatedriskblog.com.

Show Comments Hide Comments

Comments

Sign up for Inman’s Morning Headlines
What you need to know to start your day with all the latest industry developments
Success!
Thank you for subscribing to Morning Headlines.
Back to top
×