The Seattle based brokerage has always claimed its business model was more in line with consumers’ interests.

Redfin CEO Glenn Kelman has insisted on numerous occasions, that by having non-commission buyers’ agents, it can negotiate more effectively for its clients. From yesterday’s Seattle Times:

“Traditional real-estate brokerage has a screwed-up compensation system. It pays its agents to close [sales] regardless of whether it’s a good price [for the buyer].”

Now he has the data to back that up.

Today Redfin released the details of the Redfin Advantage, a hard analysis of its past year in business. From their press release:

[Redfin’s] Seattle-area buyers’ agents negotiate a price that is on average lower than the listing price, while other area brokerages negotiate a price on average above the listing price.

Some more hard numbers from their findings (Read the full report here):

  • Redfin King County customers paid on average 99.329% of the listing price while buyers with other brokerages paid 100.233% of listing price for a difference of .904%, for an average savings of $4,474;
  • The total Redfin Advantage, combining the negotiating advantage and an average Washington commission refund of 1.952%, was 2.856%. The total savings for an average Washington customer was $14,134;

Certainly on the sell side, a commission based model makes a lot of sense to me. But I too have struggled conceptually with the idea that, as a buyer, my Realtor’s compensation should be based on the final sales price.

Do Redfin’s numbers bear this out? Is Kelman right? Are consumers better served by a non-commission based buyers’ model?

This is a debate that has been played out in many forums already (check out the Bloodhound Blog’s archives for a good look at the issue) – but Kelman’s claims are bound to stir the pot again. He’s gotten very good at antagonizing the industry and despite the occasional “mea culpa” – he clearly seems to relish the role of taking on the old guard.


sellsius real estate blog has called Redfin the ‘Rebel With A Cause‘ who play themselves as the perpetual underdogs. I’m not sure that’s entirely the case – but they do go to great lengths to set up an “us vs. them” mentality. I don’t think Kelman necessarily sees he or his company as the bad boys; more like the Mavericks of the real estate world – wildly unpredictable and disrespectful of authority, but in the end stand a decent chance of splashing some MiGs.


More Coverage:

Show Comments Hide Comments


Sign up for Inman’s Morning Headlines
What you need to know to start your day with all the latest industry developments
Thank you for subscribing to Morning Headlines.
Back to top