If a buyer and seller in a real estate transaction are each represented by separate agents from the same brokerage, do those agents owe a fiduciary duty to both buyer and seller? The California Supreme Court may soon decide that question for the more than 400,000 agents and brokers in the Golden State.
Article image credited to travellight / Shutterstock.com
Comments
Related Articles
Hiroshi Horiike, a retired Chinese millionaire, bought a Malibu house in 2007 for $12.25 million cash. The advertised square footage was 15,000 square feet, but the actual square footage was under 9,500. Horiike sued the listing agent, Chris Cortazzo, and Coldwell Banker, the broker, for violating fiduciary duties.
A new Morgan Stanley study concludes that Zillow is enabling agents to increase the number of dual agency transactions through Zillow ads. “Zillow is enabling premier agent advertisers to increase the number of transactions within which they represent both the buyer and the seller, known as a dual agency transaction,” according to Morgan Stanley’s AlphaWise study published today.
The role of the real estate agent isn’t one that should be blurred, but regulations in most states don’t clarify an integral ethical standard for brokerages. In California and 24 other states, it’s legal for a brokerage to have real estate agents acting as the representation for both the buyer and the seller — what’s also known as “dual agency.”