The 4.5% mortgage myth?
Perspective: Borrowing into trouble easier than borrowing out
By Lou Barnes, Friday, December 19, 2008.
Flickr photo by Moe.The Fed's cut to "zero to 0.25 percent" cost of money and non-response in the mortgage markets combined to produce consternation among a refinance-hungry public.
Excepting a frantic hour at no-fee 4.75 percent on Wednesday morning, mortgage rates remain as they have been for 10 days, roughly 5 percent with an inescapable origination fee. And that deal is available only for the best FICOs and loan-to-values.
These rates are not going lower any time soon, not on a sustained basis, not without extraordinary intervention by the "Obamanauts." Miracles are rare.
The average client simply does not believe the paragraphs above. If I were not a lifer in the mortgage trade, I wouldn't believe them either.
In the last month, irresponsible media reports, wishful expectation by housing industry survivors, and trial balloons by non-market theorists have made "four-and-a-half" (percent interest rates) a national imaginary fact.
Why are rates stuck? The main roadblock is the $10 trillion in outstanding first mortgages, rates scattered from mid-sixes to 5.25 percent. Toss out the ones that can't refi (jumbos, underwater vs. appraisal, clogged by piggyback second, stated-income or no-doc underwriting ...) and the adjustable-rate mortgages that no longer need to hurry -- $6 trillion, anyway. The first $1 trillion, above 6 percent, everybody who bought from 2004-08, is in the money right now, eligible to refi with quick recapture of costs. That volume is equivalent to the total production capacity of the mortgage industry in 2008, severely diminished since the September financial cardiac arrest.
"But refis are just rollovers, not new money ...?" The current owner of a 6 percent mortgage-backed security may have little interest in 5 percent or 4.5 percent. The last people who bought those, in 2003, lost money every day since. Worse, the financial system is still "deleveraging" -- trying to sell IOUs, not buy.
"But if money doesn't cost anything ...?" The Fed is acting in an emergency. It will not last forever. When it ends, rates will rise, explosively from time to time. The zero-cost money is overnight money, and it's a bad idea to finance a 30-year loan with overnight money. Long-term Treasury rates are also approaching zero, the spread versus mortgages unbelievable. The Treasury market is the most liquid in the world; when the economy bottoms, today's Treasury investors-for-safety will be able to dump at little loss. Even top-quality MBS are not very liquid... buyers at this level and below will get killed in the turn, and cannot hedge that risk in a Treasury market priced for a new Great Depression.
"Why is 4 (percent) so hard?" The one and only time that U.S. mortgages reached 4 percent: at the GI Bill rollout of VA loans on July 25, 1944: it went to 4.5 percent on May 5, 1953, 4.75 percent on April 4, 1958, and to 5.25 percent 15 months later. That's it, the cumulative history of "four-something," all in a very different world. Also, those rates were set so low that the seller to a veteran had to pay two to four points for the veteran's loan.
"Why doesn't the government buy, or just make 4 percent loans?" See $10 trillion, above. The total U.S. national debt traded on markets is only $6.5 trillion. One of the awful aspects of our predicament: having borrowed our way into trouble, there are limits to borrowing our way out.
"But my brother-in-law said he got 'X' percent!" Bernie Madoff's clients got into trouble believing one-upmanship fables told by their neighbors. The fibs told in a locker room full of teenage boys about their sex escapades don't hold a candle to your friends' tales of their mortgage conquests.
Call me when we hit bottom, will you? Or at 4 percent, whichever. The law of refis: Do any deal that works, recapturing costs in a year or so. Can't know the future. Lock your rate, then don't watch TV for three weeks or talk with your brother-in-law.
"But you said rates could crawl lower ...?" Yup. It took a year for rates to move from 6.25 percent to the 45-year low of 5.25 percent in June 2003, working off masses of refis at each intermediate stage. Lasted one month.
Lou Barnes is a mortgage broker and nationally syndicated columnist based in Boulder, Colo. He can be reached at lbarnes@boulderwest.com.
***
What's your opinion? Leave your comments below or send a letter to the editor. To contact the writer, click the byline at the top of the story.
All rights reserved. This article may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.


You must login or register to post a comment.
Submitted by Scott Epstein on December 19, 2008 - 1:31pm.
The government is out of options as they can not really lower interest rates any more. The government should have come up with a significant stimulus for the tax payers, not just give it to financial institutions who either have just sat on the money or have used it to purchase other financial institutions. Lets say they would have instead "refunded" every american their income taxes for the past 3-5 years? This would have allowed people to pay off revolving debt, make large purchases or just save it. Either way it would have helped the economy in some way, bad loans become better, retail sales numbers get better and banks get funded.
So now the only way the fed can lower rates is to buy US treasuries in large quantities, which in turn should lower mortgage rates. However, like you say, it's only available to a relatively small number of homeowners. I understand the amount of debt this country is going to have and the potential inflation we face years down the road, but in order to fix the housing crisis and get this economy turned around I believe the government needs to allow all homeowners who are in good standing on their loan to refinance at these lower prices. In order for the american tax payer to access any of the TARP money, they need to borrow it, so why not accomplish that through refi's?
Scott Epstein
Broker/Owner
Realty Resources LLC
www.illinoisrealestate.com
Submitted by Ned Carey on December 19, 2008 - 1:48pm.
It amazes me how so many people think short term Fed rates have much affect on thirty year mortgage rates.
You are right; short term, there are limits to being able to borrow our way out of this mess. Long run borrowing our way out of this mess will only make things worse.
Ned Carey
http://baltimorerealestateinvestingblog.com/2008/10/lessons-from-warren-...
Submitted by Mike Dunn on December 19, 2008 - 2:29pm.
We have seen 4.5% one time for 1 hour, and t was a wholesale price. Rates continue to hover around 5% and thats as good as it gets. Home owners need to not be so concerned about 4.875 or 5%. These are Rates we will never see again. Take what you can get and be happy your not in your grandfathers 14.5% rate of yesteryear. check us out at www.thechangestation.com
Submitted by Robert A. Hulme on December 19, 2008 - 3:16pm.
I agree with Ned, short term Fed rates have never affected 30 year rates very much. I also agree with you that rates will not go much lower, now is the time to refi if you are able, otherwise, rent out your present property and upgrade to a home that has had the bottom drop out from under it.
Robert A. Hulme
Realtor, GRI, e-PRO
Prudential Utah Real Estate
Loan Officer
Envision Lending Group, Inc.
www.UtahCountyRealEstate.us
www.LoansByRobert.net
801-885-2586
Submitted by Emmanuel Scanlan on December 19, 2008 - 3:30pm.
Scott Epstein,
You have hit the situation directly on target!! When this all began and the bailouts started I could not believe the American public did not cry out louder. All our government is doing is handing out corporate welfare checks and driver the country, and its real taxpayers (the citizens) deaper into debt!!
Emmanuel Scanlan
PS Inspection & Property Services LLC
www.psinspection.com
Knowledge is power, but sharing knowledge brings peace!