Is homeownership 'over'?
House Keys
By Marcie Geffner, Tuesday, July 14, 2009.
Flickr photo by anemoneprojectors.Throughout most of the three decades from 1969 to 1999, approximately 63 percent to 66 percent of U.S. households were homeowners, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. At the end of that period, the homeownership rate broke its historical bounds and climbed to 67 percent. In the next 10 years, the rate rose to 68 percent and then 69 percent.
Much of this rise in homeownership was driven by government policies. Homeowners have been rewarded with sizable income-tax deductions for mortgage interest and property tax, and the tax code also all but eliminated capital gains tax on the sale of a principal residence.
The result was a nation of property flippers who pocketed hundreds of thousands of tax-free dollars. Add an ocean of easy money and we had what looked like a lot of proud, happy new homeowners.
The people who earn their living from real property sales naturally were ecstatic: Homebuilding boomed. Realty and mortgage brokers earned some serious money. Real estate investment became profitable. And homeowners flush with equity went on a wild spending spree.
The folks in the apartment business were not so ecstatic. Indeed, they began to resemble short people at the rear of a very large crowd. They waved their hands above their heads, stomped their feet to make some noise and tried to get someone -- or anyone -- to listen to their message that renting a home was good, too.
Now, the homeownership rate has retreated to the 67 percent level of nine years ago. That's still historically high, yet it's lower than the peak and it's enough of a dip to beg an obvious question: Is homeownership over?
The question isn't frivolous, as the answer will affect the lives of every man, woman and child in the nation. If the age of homeownership is over, many more people will choose to live in rental housing and those who do decide to own their own home may have to learn to live with much less equity growth. If the age of homeownership isn't over, homeowners may have cause for celebration sometime in the future. Either way, the implications for government housing policy will be profound. ...CONTINUED
All rights reserved. This article may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.


You must login or register to post a comment.
Submitted by Utah Realtor on July 14, 2009 - 12:50pm.
Unless Americans are now better with money (not likely)or move less often, the home ownership rate probably does need to stay about the same as it historically has. It'll probably decline a little bit more in the next few years.
Alan Barker
Cornerstone Real Estate Professionals
http://www.utahcornerstone.com
http://www.utahrealestate4sale.com
Submitted by Robert A. Hulme on July 14, 2009 - 1:38pm.
As always, Alan Barker is right. We are most likely are going to see a decline in home ownership, at least for near future.
www.UtahCountyHomes.ws
www.UtahCountyRealEstate.us
Submitted by Ken Lampton on July 15, 2009 - 8:24am.
The headline of this article seems a bit overly dramatic. Does anyone dispute the idea that the recent increase in percentage of homeownership was mostly the result of lax loan underwriting standards? The rate of homeownership was bound to go up so long as huge quantities of investor money was chasing after mortgage backed securities. And the rate of homeownership will decline so long as investors continue to shun mortgage backed securities. But this certainly doesn't mean the desire for homeownership is "over".
Submitted by Marcie Geffner on July 20, 2009 - 9:09am.
Good comments, Alan, Robert, Ken. Thank you.
I might just add that I don't believe the desire for homeownership is over, but rather that the hyperbole has rightly been taken down quite a few notches. People shouldn't be so entirely willing to believe 100% that homeownership is always by definition and without discussion the preferred choice for housing for everyone. For many, yes. For all, no.
Marcie Geffner
www.marciegeffner.com