6 tips to better real estate photos

Fixing image problems is key

Inman News®

Ashley Myers collects bad photography. Specifically, she collects bad real estate photos -- the ones that seem to go out of their way to make a home unappealing to would-be buyers.

To make her point on her blog on the ActiveRain.com networking site for real estate agents, Myers easily drums up half a dozen offenders culled from her local multiple listing service in Richardson, Texas: pictures that emphasize garish furniture instead of the room it's in.

Fuzzy snaps of unremarkable bathroom vanities. Cloudy rooms -- photographed at night -- that are so underlit that one strains to discern such hard-to-miss features as a fireplace mantle.

And that's just the technical quality of the photography: Real estate sites abound in rooms with partially made beds and floors strewn with socks or kitchens where the garbage overflows the cans.

"There are so many things real estate agents do" that sabotage the photographs of their own listings, says Myers. "I guess the two worst would either have to be lighting that's so low you can't see anything in the house -- and just shooting from poor angles, like when the real estate agent focuses the picture on the door frame instead of the actual room."

Myers started advocating for better photo quality when she was in training to become a real estate agent; she was assigned to study an aspect of the business that needed improvement. She says most property photos uploaded to multiple listing services and real estate marketing Web sites are taken by the agents who have the listings and who may otherwise be great at sales but are out to lunch when it comes to composing a quality photograph.

These pictures, she says, can have a huge influence in attracting prospective buyers to a house. Conversely, they also can shut the door to a sale.

"Real estate agents can't sell something to (consumers) who (chose not to contact) him because they didn't like the pictures," says Dennis Huckaby, an architectural photographer in Blaine, Wash.

Huckaby estimates he's shot 700 homes, mostly for real estate agents. He now teaches state-certified continuing-education courses on the topic for agents in Washington state.

He cites industry statistics suggesting that a vast majority of homebuyers begin their searches on the Internet, so the pictures they see there are crucial to getting them through the door. And they don't have to be "bad" pictures to be a turnoff, he said.

"If 87 percent of the market starts on the Internet, a huge chunk of them are only looking for pictures," Huckaby said. "If people are putting up bland images that are the same as everybody else's, then 87 percent of the market is skating right by."

Some suggestions for both agents and their clients, and for those going the for-sale-by-owner route:

1. Preparation is most of the battle, Huckaby said. The same advice about ruthlessly eliminating clutter for buyer tours applies to the room photography, too. That means emptying countertops, removing knickknacks, etc.

But there are exceptions, he said: Sometimes a well-placed vase of flowers or arrangement of fruit on a long stretch of bare countertop provides a focal point that makes the picture.

"If sunlight strikes across that counter from a window behind, that's where the bowl of fruit should be placed," he said. "People will look at the brightest part of the image."

Both he and Myers are advocates of staging -- bringing in furnishings to dress up empty rooms.

"I never quite saw the importance of it before, but the more I work with buyers, the easier it is to see that walking into a house that's been staged even minimally, it's better on the eyes," and helps them picture themselves living there, Myers said. ...CONTINUED

Share with REmessenger

You must login or register to post a comment.

 
Submitted by Robert A. Hulme on November 4, 2009 - 5:23am.

Great tips for showcasing your listing.

www.AlpineUtHomes.com
www.LehiUtHomes.com

 
Submitted by Jon Larrance on November 4, 2009 - 11:35am.

I have to say that I disagree with Tip #3 "Skip The Flash" on principle. Most real estate professionals lack the necessary skills, not to mention the proper photography equipment, needed to "set the camera for a longer exposure, steadied by an inexpensive tripod."

I'm always telling our agents to use the Force Flash option on their point-and-shoot cameras. By using the Force Flash option (the lighting bolt icon on most digital cameras) you take the reliance away from the camera's Auto Flash setting which makes a determination based upon ambient light - in most cases it would choose not to flash (as suggested in Tip #3). The problem with that is say a lot of light is shining in a window, the camera will adjust its aperature to properly expose for the window light thus insufficiently exposing the rest of the room. With the flash forced to flash, the rest of the room will be lit and the camera will expose the room more evenly.

However, to achieve the best quality (with some expense) hire a professional real estate photographer who has the proper equipment needed to get perfect exposures.
---
Jon Larrance
Vice President
Perry & Co.
Denver, CO
303.336.4744

 
Submitted by Chris Freeman on November 4, 2009 - 2:18pm.

Some excellent tips for better photos and it's something many agents should read. Being a former commercial photographer, it's hard to look at some of the poorer examples I'm sure we've all seen. Then again, there are agents like Teresa Boardman who are equally adept at photography and selling real estate and her photos stand out for their quality.

To remark on Jon's comments above, my recommendation is to shoot both with the flash on and off - shoot a photo both ways and see what works best with the ambient light. He's certainly right that some people lack the skills and should use the flash, but it's not a "one size fits all" solution to always or never use the on-camera flash. On-camera flash is the worst place to put a main light but the best place to put what's called a fill light. Try both ways since you can simply delete the one you don't use.

Another recommendation is HDR photography, or High Dynamic Range imaging. Google it and use it if you're willing to shoot using a tripod (which every photographer would highly recommend).

Ansel Adams once stated that the problem with modern photography is that it's too easy. One can get a photo with almost no effort and when one shoots for an advertisement, it needs to be well thought out and planned - not what I refer to as a drive-by shooting.

Chris Freeman
Chief Technology Officer
WOLFNET www.wolfnet.com

 
Submitted by Greg Salera on November 4, 2009 - 3:49pm.

Excellent article and right on point! Great pictures are most definately the first step toward selling a property and the wrong pictures can actually be worse than no pictures at all.

I invested in a DSLR camera, zoom lens, and tri-pod for my listings. I almost never use the flash and have also discovered that it is sometimes best to shoot pictures at night (they create drama when paired with the right lighting and camera setting) I don't normally use a wide lens except in cases where that picture can be displayed without being cropped or distorted.

I have a mock virtual tour that I take along on listing appointments paired with 3 before and after shots of staging photos to share with my clients.

Photo editing softwear is another great tool to help enhance photos and it's surprising how a bad photo can be transformed into your best shot when properly edited.

Greg Salera
Partners Real Estate
9300-A Old Keene Mill Rd
Burke, VA 22015
www.virginiarealtyservices.com