LOS ANGELES — Many of America’s cities are in the crapper thanks to years of policy that’s favored suburbs and sprawl, writes The New York Times’ architecture critic Nicolai Ouroussoff. But with a city guy in the Oval Office, and billions being pumped into urban centers, this trend is reversible and opportunity especially lies in four cities: New Orleans, Buffalo, New York City’s Bronx borough, and Los Angeles.
Ouroussoff acknowledges our city has fared better than most (our booming population has been spared from natural disasters), but our limited transit network and our lack of green space threaten the livability of L.A., and if unchecked, could turn the city into a North American Cairo. But a "citywide plan that anchored Los Angeles along two major axes — the green river and the asphalt boulevard — could save it from becoming a third world city," writes Ouroussoff, a former architecture critic for the Los Angeles Times. [Image via the L.A. Times]
- Specifically, Ouroussoff wants the ambitious plan to re-green the L.A. River to move forward. Returning part of the concrete bed to its natural state would grant park space to diverse communities from the San Fernando Valley to Long Beach. Councilman Ed Reyes told Ouroussoff that $100 million could get the plan jump-started at least near downtown.
- Public transit needs a shot in the arm; most important is getting a train under Wilshire Boulevard that connects our cultural institutions (the Wiltern, LACMA, the Hammer, and Eli Broad’s new museum at Wilshire and Santa Monica). Concentrating public transit and culture on Wilshire could give L.A. the center it’s always been searching for.
- Also, in a nice shout-out, Ouroussoff acknowledges that L.A. "has the most talented cluster of architects practicing anywhere in the United States."
Copyright (c) 2009 Curbed.com LLC
What’s your opinion? Leave your comments below or send a letter to the editor.