What does it look like when a federal department changes its mind? And if that department's opinion has been offered in an ongoing court case involving a federal agency -- what does that mean? This is the current scenario describing the Department of Justice's (DOJ's) stance toward the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), which is embroiled in a regulatory battle with mortgage lender PHH. That regulatory argument involves RESPA (the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act) and how PHH managed its partnerships -- but how the CFPB is structured and whether or not the president has the power to remove the CFPB's director (and when the president can do so) has become a central issue to the case. Tomorrow, March 21, the House Financial Services Committee will hold a hearing titled "The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection's (CFPB's) Unconstitutional Design" that will undoubtedly examine the president's ability to fire the bureau's director at will. The next oral argu...
- Whether or not the president has the power to remove the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's director has become a central issue in a case between the CFPB and mortgage lender PHH that began in 2014.
- An appeals court ruled the CFPB's structure unconstitutional last fall, and the Department of Justice is no longer on the bureau's side.
Don't miss the real estate event of the summer
Join 4,000 real estate pros at Connect SF, Aug 7‑11, 2017