Bill would suspend new appraisal rules

NAR seeks 18-month reprieve on valuation code

Inman News®

Legislation that would grant a plea by the National Association of Realtors to suspend for 18 months new rules governing appraisals conducted on loans purchased by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac has been introduced in the House of Representatives.

Rep. Travis Childers, D-Miss., is sponsoring the bill, HR 3044, and Rep. Gary Miller, D-Calif., is the lone co-sponsor to date. The bill, which would impose an 18-month moratorium on the Home Valuation Code of Conduct, was introduced June 25 and referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Critics say that after the code went into effect on May 1, lenders began relying more on appraisal management firms employing appraisers who lacked experience in their local markets. Some appraisers are also relying too heavily on distressed properties when identifying comparable sales in valuing nondistressed properties, critics say.

NAR and the National Association of Home Builders believe that low appraisals derailed many sales in May. A trade association representing appraisers, the Appraisal Institute, has also raised concerns about the code, but maintains that when appraisals don't not match the sales price, the fault is with the market, not the appraisal (see story).

The code, which does not apply to jumbo loans, FHA or VA loans, was intended to protect appraisers from pressure by lenders to hit predetermined values. It prohibits mortgage brokers originating loans to be purchased by Fannie and Freddie from ordering appraisals directly, and requires bank loan officers to delegate the process of ordering appraisals to other in-house staff or to go through an appraisal management company.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and their federal regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, agreed to abide by the code after New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo subpoenaed Fannie and Freddie as part of an investigation into the packaging of mortgage loans into securities sold to Wall Street investors.

In November 2007, the state of New York sued First American Corp. and its appraisal management subsidiary, eAppraiseIT, accusing the companies of bowing to pressure from Washington Mutual to inflate property appraisals. WaMu was not named in the suit, which is ongoing, and the companies have denied wrongdoing (see story).

***

What's your opinion? Leave your comments below or send a letter to the editor.

Share with REmessenger

You must login or register to post a comment.

 
Submitted by Robert A. Hulme on June 29, 2009 - 2:28pm.

Great move, we need whatever help we can get to change the new procedures that are in place with the Appraisal system.

www.ChandlerRealEstate.us
www.TempeRealEstate.us

 
Submitted by Marty Boardman on June 30, 2009 - 3:47am.

Next on their list should be the 91 day seasoning requirement for FHA loans. How is it that an investor who purchases a home at the courthouse steps, all cash, can not sell to an FHA buyer until title has been seasoned for three months? Yet if the lender acquires the property at the sale they can immediately sell it without the same requirement.

Marty Boardman
Loan Modification Consultant
Choice Loan Consulting, Gilbert, AZ
My blog: www.freerealestateeeducation.com

 
Submitted by Derek Eisenberg on June 30, 2009 - 4:05am.

The new appraisal rules have minimal effect on sales. Appraisers still get a copy of the contract. It's only refinances where appraisers can't see an estimated value going in. Deals are dying because the comps are low due to excess supply in the marketplace. People forget the period after the S&L crisis where the same thing happened. It's easy to point the finger at the new appraisal rules but where's the data to back it up? There sure are plenty of low comps to support those low appraisals but no high ones to show the opposite.

Derek Eisenberg
http://www.mls2u.com

 
Submitted by Tom Molinari on June 30, 2009 - 5:51am.

The problem here is not necessarily with the HVCC. It is with the appraisal management companies(AMCs). Appraisers are not chosen for appraisal assignments based upon their level of experience, education, or the quality of their work. Most(but not all)large AMCs choose an appraiser to do an appraisal based upon who will complete the assignment for the lowest price and with the quickest turn time. Period. In many cases the AMCs take half of the total appraisal fee or more. While your client is being charged $400 for their appraisal, often times the appraiser is being paid only $150 to $175 of that by the AMCs. The most qualified and experienced appraisers will not accept their cut rate fees leaving the least qualifed or least experienced appraisers getting the bulk of the AMC appraisal work. Until a system is put in place that gives preference to experience, quality, and education and pays market fees, this problem wiil persist.