U.S. real estate prices see slight monthly rise in April
CoreLogic: Home-price index down 33.8% from peak
By Inman News, Wednesday, June 1, 2011.
U.S. home prices rose slightly on a monthly basis in April, the first such increase since the expiration of a federal homebuyer tax credit program in mid-2010, according to data aggregator CoreLogic.
A home-price index compiled by CoreLogic showed national home prices in April up 0.7 percent month-to-month. On a year-over-year basis, however, prices were down 7.5 percent -- an even steeper annual decline than in March, when the index fell a revised 6.8 percent.
When distressed sales -- short sales and REOs (bank-owned homes) -- are excluded from the index, however, the index showed home prices declining year-over-year by 0.5 percent in April and 1.6 percent in March.
"While the economic recovery is still fragile and one data point is not a trend, the month-over-month increase based on April sales activity is a positive sign. This is the first month-over-month increase in the HPI since government support for homebuying was removed, and it provides reason for cautious optimism," said Mark Fleming, chief economist for CoreLogic, in a statement.
Since the index's April 2006 peak, home prices have fallen 33.8 percent, CoreLogic said.
The five states with the greatest depreciation in April were Idaho (-15.2 percent), Michigan (-13.2 percent), Arizona (-11.9 percent), Rhode Island (-11.6 percent) and Nevada (-11.4 percent).
The five states with the highest appreciation were North Dakota (+4.2 percent), Vermont (+3.4 percent), New York (+3.2 percent), Washington, D.C. (+2.2 percent) and Mississippi (+1.4 percent).
Of the 100 most-populous metro areas tracked by CoreLogic, 92 saw year-over-year index declines in April.
Change in CoreLogicHPI, 10 largest markets
| Market | Change from a year ago | Excluding distressed |
| Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, Ill. | -11.1% | -2.8% |
| Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale, Ariz. | -11% | -5.9% |
| Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, Ga. | -9.1% | -5.6% |
| Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, Calif. | -5.1% | 2.8% |
| Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, Calif. | -4.1% | -1.4% |
| Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, Texas | -3.4% | 6.4% |
| Philadelphia, Pa. | -1.6% | 1.7% |
| Dallas-Plano-Irving, Texas | -1.4% | 4.9% |
| Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, D.C.-Va.-Md.-W.Va. | -0.3% | 5.5% |
| New York-White Plains-Wayne, N.Y.-N.J. | 2% | 3.1% |
Source: CoreLogic
| Contact Inman News: | |||
 Email |  Letter to the Editor | ||
All rights reserved. This content may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this content without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.
You must login or register to post a comment.
Submitted by Jon Astaris on June 1, 2011 - 3:44pm.
Cautious reason for optimism?! Spin the numbers until they scream, and then fish a rabbit from the borscht... Whose propaganda minister is this guy?
Submitted by Jon Astaris on June 1, 2011 - 3:46pm.
Cautious reason for optimism?! Spin the numbers until they scream, and then fish a rabbit from the borscht... Whose propaganda minister is this guy?
Submitted by Ruthmarie Hicks on June 1, 2011 - 7:22pm.
I'm from the White Plains NY area - I was seeing the increase in some types of housing when doing an apples to apples comparison - but a median price decrease as more homes that were in distressed condition were actually closing. So this makes sense to me.
Some parts of our market are still going down - but not by much and we are either bouncing on the bottom or going up slightly. The closer to NYC and the nearer public transportation to NYC - the better off the market. Its pretty much location, location, location.