After six weeks in a narrow range, a little not-so-bad economic news blew long-term rates to the highs of 2008: the 10-year Treasury to 4.13 percent (the first time above 4 percent since New Year’s) and low-fee mortgages to 6.375 percent. Both of those yields are better this morning, but we will not see five-something mortgages again without a new round of bad economic reports.
The psychology-reversing news came in two pieces. The rout started on Wednesday with the report of April orders for durable goods: down 0.5 percent, overall, but ex-transportation (airplanes and autos) up 2.5 percent, and "non-defense capital goods" plus 4.5 percent. Yesterday’s coup de grace: First-quarter GDP was revised to plus 0.9 percent from 0.6 percent.
If these two reports seem like less-than-spectacular signs of resurrection, you are well on your way to a degree in economics. These are lousy figures describing an economy with hardly any forward momentum. However, they are not recession numbers. For three-something Treasurys and five-something mortgages to look good to investors, recession fear must return.
The bond market is a binary place: The economy is either going to hell and it’s a great time to buy bonds, or the economy is OK and everybody who bought a bond is a greasy spot in the road. Despite widespread market forecasts of the latter (futures markets have the Fed tightening by fall), data describe an undecided economy: April personal income and spending each in negligible 0.2 percent gains, and at that inclusive of the first rebate checks. Brand-new consumer confidence surveys are unchanged at the worst levels in 28 years. Note that stocks this week have not joined the all-OK party. Note further that close-cousin Canada’s GDP, despite resource-production boost, went negative 0.3 percent in the first quarter.
The credit crunch is still doing its work. Financing for car buyers is disappearing: Subprime AmeriCredit alone is contracting at a 340,000-vehicle annual pace. Last year 2 million autos were bought with proceeds of home equity lines of credit; half of that would be an optimistic estimate for this year.
The most extraordinary aspect of this not-quite-recession spring: that the labor market has held together. The Federal Reserve has forecast a rising unemployment rate since last fall, to approach 6 percent this year, yet it sits still at 5 percent. The "why" is very clear, now: The global economy is pulling us along.
In recent cycles, forecasting the U.S. economy by itself has not been all that hard — the dozen big slowdowns in the last half-century have had useful similarities. However, the explosion in global commerce since 2000 has neither precedent nor parallel. Global forecasting today is a spectator sport — neither science, nor art, nor darts, most data spun beyond meaning by investment salespeople.
Here’s a try at an ex-U.S. centerline: The U.K. has all of our weaknesses and worse inflation; watch its recession develop and maybe see our future. The euro-zone has more internal variance than the difference between Detroit and Seattle: Germany, super-skilled at foreign trade, is still robust, only retail sales nosing over. The weak euro sisters, derisively dubbed "Club Med" (Italy, Spain…), are headed for as much trouble as the U.K. The continent’s 3.6 percent inflation, rising, may force the ECB to tighten into a slowdown.
Japan is in mothballs, with population declining now, what little growth there dependent on pull-through of exports of components to Asia on their way to elsewhere.
"BRIC," short for Brazil-Russia-India-China: Brazil is having a nice run, but is no global locomotive. Russia … here in the U.S. we filet and fry oil executives; ex-Gazprom CEO Dimitry Anatolyevich Medvedev is president-elect. Kleptocracy, not engine.
India and China: locomotives. India’s GDP just "slowed" to 8.8 percent, China is "dipping" below 11 percent. Inflation rates in both have doubled since January. As they go, we will go, and will go oil.
Lou Barnes is a mortgage broker and nationally syndicated columnist based in Boulder, Colo. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
What’s your opinion? Leave your comments below or send a letter to the editor. To contact the writer, click the byline at the top of the story.