Inflation fears this week abruptly gave way to concern for the economy, with long-term rates and stocks dipping accordingly. Overriding all financial news: The miraculous outbreak of an authentic effort to repair the nation’s finances.

One at a time: By the end of last week, inflation worrywarts had begun to expect Federal Reserve tightening this year. On Monday, Federal Reserve Board Vice Chairman Janet Yellen and New York Federal Reserve President Bill Dudley blew them up altogether. Fed tightening now is inconceivable.

Forecasters have called for 4 percent-plus U.S. Gross Domestic Product growth, but a crowd is elbowing for the exit, revising suddenly as low as 1.5 percent. March retail sales were soggy, a 0.4 percent gain and only 0.1 percent ex-gasoline.

New claims for unemployment insurance spiked 27,000 to 412,000 last week, the highest in two months. The March survey of small business, by the National Federation of Independent Business, retreated from all gains since last October — in sharp contradiction to the Fed’s Beige Book, brimming with happy-talk fairytales from inflation-hawk regional Fed presidents.

The one bright spot has been manufacturing: March industrial production beat estimates, gaining 0.8 percent, and capacity in use, up to 77.4 percent, is the highest in post-Lehman times.

Inflation fears this week abruptly gave way to concern for the economy, with long-term rates and stocks dipping accordingly. Overriding all financial news: The miraculous outbreak of an authentic effort to repair the nation’s finances.

One at a time: By the end of last week, inflation worrywarts had begun to expect Federal Reserve tightening this year. On Monday, Federal Reserve Board Vice Chairman Janet Yellen and New York Federal Reserve President Bill Dudley blew them up altogether. Fed tightening now is inconceivable.

Forecasters have called for 4 percent-plus U.S. Gross Domestic Product growth, but a crowd is elbowing for the exit, revising suddenly as low as 1.5 percent. March retail sales were soggy, a 0.4 percent gain and only 0.1 percent ex-gasoline.

New claims for unemployment insurance spiked 27,000 to 412,000 last week, the highest in two months. The March survey of small business, by the National Federation of Independent Business, retreated from all gains since last October — in sharp contradiction to the Fed’s Beige Book, brimming with happy-talk fairytales from inflation-hawk regional Fed presidents.

The one bright spot has been manufacturing: March industrial production beat estimates, gaining 0.8 percent, and capacity in use, up to 77.4 percent, is the highest in post-Lehman times.

The benchmark for any U.S. deficit fix is the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, aka Bowles-Simpson (for co-chairmen Erksine Bowles and former-Sen. Alan Simpson), released Nov. 10, 2008 (www.fiscalcommission.gov).

The summary should be memorized by every student and adult, and worshiped as no documents beyond the Federalist Papers, Declaration, and Constitution. NCFRR does suggest what to do, but its fairness, humanity, wisdom and principles are a durable guide to how to do it.

Aside from the ideal structures of taxation and spending priority, NCFRR has one crucial insight and discipline: We must settle on the size of government as measured by percent of GDP. We must no longer tolerate in ourselves the right’s perpetual dodge of taxation, starving revenue from necessary spending; nor can we tolerate the left’s perpetual burglary, committing future spending without revenue.

NCFRR suggests 21 percent of GDP, revenue and spending in approximate balance — 21 percent is the baseline for spending ever since WWII. I don’t care, give or take a couple of points. Go much lower and government will become a cold and pinched vision of Calvin Coolidge. Go much higher and we’ll be lost in bureaucratic bloat, inefficiency, and confiscatory redistribution.

Small imbalances are OK: deficits in the 1 to 2 percent range (each percent is about $150 billion). Today’s spending is 24 percent of GDP, in the early stages of unfunded entitlement explosion headed above 30 percent. Tax revenue today is 15 percent of GDP.

It’s a big hole. However, revenue has been suppressed about 3 percent by the Great Recession.

From my usual centrist perspective (designed to annoy everybody), of the two deficit-fixes — that of Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., or President Obama — which is closest to wisdom and a compromise solution?

Ryan earns praise for tax reform, removing tax goodies in favor of low brackets, and for trying to cap health care cost (really, the entire future entitlement problem). It is on the short side of 21 percent, a safety net with holes. It fails on two other grounds: no additional revenue except by GDP growth, and no cuts in defense.

Obama’s proposal is harder to figure because his behavior has been so odd. He ignored the NCFRR report when released, then dismissed it in his State of the Union, then in February brought an as-is budget, and has since refused to engage the matter. Then on Wednesday, he delivered a hurried, no-detail proposal in a peculiarly timed 1:30 p.m. speech.

He had this key line: "If we truly believe in a progressive vision of our society, we have the obligation to prove that we can afford our commitments."

No, sir. Not that way. That is the old, corrupt way. Henceforth we cannot make commitments until we have agreed on what we can afford.

The most important thing: There is going to be a deal. The electorate is exhausted with living beyond its means. To the consternation of financial hyenas now salivating at the prospect of U.S. default … ain’t gonna happen.

As markets process the news of many fewer new Treasurys ahead, great benefits from sacrifice will accrue.

Show Comments Hide Comments

Comments

Sign up for Inman’s Morning Headlines
What you need to know to start your day with all the latest industry developments
Success!
Thank you for subscribing to Morning Headlines.
Back to top