The National Association of Realtors' monthly series on sales of existing homes should come with a data-translating thesaurus. NAR does not mean to mislead, but I think its data format conceals reality. The data are useful, but only as a broad, multi-month guide to trends. Each monthly figure gets a lot of headline ink, and the 10 percent decline in November got plenty -- and some editorial commentary by NAR. But each monthly is not what it seems. I know that few readers are fond of math, but here it comes. NAR’s monthlies are annualized and seasonally adjusted. “Annualized” means the actual monthly sales figure multiplied by 12. The seasonal adjustment tries to take into account...seasons, which are a profound variable in home sales. The annualized monthly result is then trumpeted as a percentage change from the prior month’s annualized adjusted figure. Technologists refer to GIGO -- garbage in, garbage out. NAR is not that bad, but the weaknesses stand out...
- NAR’s monthlies are annualized and seasonally adjusted. Numbers of homes sold in winter are so low, in many places less than half of spring sales, that percentage changes are magnified.
- Seasonal adjustment can be inaccurate; neither weather nor interest rates nor the economy are consistent from one winter to the next.
- Trying to collect all the sales in a consistent manner each month is a challenge.
- If TRID did slow November closings, it pushed them into December, which should elevate next month's results.
Learn the New Luxury Playbook at Luxury Connect | October 18-19 at the Beverly Hills Hotel