Over 30 million people receiving benefits stand to lose $600 per week, launching the percentage of renter households facing a housing burden to 41 percent.

In the absence of further action by the federal government, unemployment benefits issued by the Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation (FPUC) program are scheduled to expire on July 31, 2020.

At that point, approximately 30 million people currently receiving benefits stand to lose $600 per week, launching the percentage of renter households facing a severe housing burden from about 3 percent of renter households to 41 percent, according to a new report from Zillow.

On a national level, workers who operate in high-contact spaces — and who have been at greatest health and economic risk during the coronavirus pandemic — make up 69 percent of the median renter household’s income, but only 50 percent of the median homeowner household’s income. Therefore, a majority of renters, who have likely been collecting federal unemployment benefits over the past few months with many high-contact industries shut down or severely restricted, stand to make a significant and negative impact on the rental market once those benefits expire.

With the federal moratorium on evictions also set to expire soon, these individuals are likely to be put in a position of dire housing insecurity.

According to the National Multifamily Housing Council (NMHC), rental payments have only dipped slightly during the coronavirus crisis with 91.3 percent of apartment households making a full or partial rent payment by July 20, down by just 2.1 percentage points from the same time one year ago. However, that metric stands to change drastically with the expiration of unemployment benefits.

In its analysis of households with at least a portion of income coming from high contact-intensity occupations, Zillow noted that renters are especially vulnerable during loss of income compared to homeowners with these types of occupations.

Alexandra Lee | Zillow Group

“The high contact-intensity workers within renter households are much more likely to be the single earner or breadwinner,” Zillow’s report, authored by Zillow Economist Alexandra Lee, states. “They also are likely to have lower incomes than their homeowner counterparts — the median renter household’s income from these occupations is $32,000, more than a third lower than the high contact-intensity income of homeowner households, which is $49,800.”

Therefore, it often doesn’t take much for high contact-intensity renters to fall into a state of housing insecurity.

“Currently, 31 percent of these renter households are already housing burdened (paying more than 30 percent of their income toward rent) and 13 percent are severely housing burdened (paying more than 50 percent of their income toward rent),” Lee says in the report. “Even if the FPUC program was extended with half of its scope — an additional $300 per week instead of $600 — 14 percent of these renter households would be severely housing burdened, a level comparable to the status quo.”

Although Lee notes that this data assumes the worst — with renters having no savings to draw from — many renters who struggle financially in fact do not have much savings. Roughly 30 percent of renters with the lowest rent burdens and 60 percent of renters with the highest rent burdens have no savings, according to Zillow.

Race makes a big difference too when it comes to high contact-intensity workers and household income. Zillow noted more Black high contact-intensity workers contribute to household income than white high contact-intensity workers, and their high-contact occupations tend to have lower incomes than high-contact white occupations.

“In Black households, high contact-intensity workers contribute 72 percent of household income, compared to 53 percent in white households,” Lee states. “The median high contact-intensity income within Black households is $38,000, 15 percent lower than the $45,000 of white households. White workers are generally in higher-paying high-contact occupations — e.g., doctors vs. food service workers. And their relatively higher incomes are buoyed by additional, even higher income within the household. On the other hand, Black high contact-intensity workers are more likely to be breadwinners within their household, with scant additional income to rely on if they get laid off or fall ill.”

Zillow noted that Milwaukee, a state in which the moratorium on evictions ended in late May, has already seen a spike in evictions, and is a region in which sharp disparities exist among renters and minority groups. In the Midwestern state, high contact-intensity income makes up 100 percent of renter household income, compared to 50 percent of homeowner household income.

At the same time, high contact-intensity income makes up 100 percent of Black household income, but just 54 percent of white household income.

Email Lillian Dickerson

coronavirus | Zillow
Show Comments Hide Comments

Comments

Sign up for Inman’s Morning Headlines
What you need to know to start your day with all the latest industry developments
Success!
Thank you for subscribing to Morning Headlines.
Back to top
×
Up-to-the-minute news and interviews in your inbox, ticket discounts for Inman events and more
1-Step CheckoutPay with a credit card
By continuing, you agree to Inman’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

You will be charged . Your subscription will automatically renew for on . For more details on our payment terms and how to cancel, click here.

Interested in a group subscription?
Finish setting up your subscription