MLS.com REAL ESTATE MULTIPLE LISTING SERVICE LISTINGS
MLS MULTIPLE LISTING SERVICE LISTINGS   
Your Trusted Real Estate Source
HOME- MLS.COM  HOME
FIND AN AGENT
MORTGAGE
CALCULATOR
LOAN INFO
WHAT'S MY
HOME WORTH?
SEARCH
FORECLOSURES
EDUCATION
GLOSSARY

THEY FOUND THEIR HOME USING MLS.COM MULTIPLE LISTING SERVICE LISTINGS
TOP METRO AREAS
THESE AREAS INCLUDE SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES

real estate, appraisal, and home inspection courses online


Building repairs don't pay off for owner
Law of the Land

July 01, 2009

By Tara-Nicholle Nelson
Inman News

In 2003, Kristine Hennessy noticed that the stucco on her property, a commercial building, had separated from the building's wall. In 2005, the remaining stucco on the building had virtually no adhesion remaining to the building's concrete walls, except on the 20 percent of the building where the underlying wall was concrete masonry blocks. Hennessy removed and replaced the damaged stucco and filed a claim with the insurance company, Mutual of Enumclaw, which later denied the claim.

In the trial of Hennessy v. Mutual of Enumclaw, a judgment was entered for Hennessy, awarding her more than $98,000 for the costs of removing the stucco and installing a new exterior.

The appeals court affirmed the trial court's judgment, but only up to the $2,469 in damages that was incurred by the 2003 stucco replacement. The terms of Hennessy's insurance policy excluded loss or damage due to collapse except in cases where the owner could prove "(1) a specified condition, such as hidden decay, (2) caused 'collapse' of a building or part of a building, and (3) the collapse resulted in direct physical loss or damage to covered property."

Because the policy itself failed to define what constitutes a "collapse," the court applied the plain, dictionary definitions of the word and found that the stucco descended or dropped involuntarily and under the force of gravity in 2003, and was not required to completely and totally fall down. Accordingly, the 2003 stucco damage was covered under the insurance policy.

However, in 2005, while Hennessy and the insurer agreed that removal and replacement of the remaining stucco on the building was prudent, due to the underlying decay and separation from the building's walls, the stucco had not yet "moved or fallen." Accordingly, Hennessy had presented no evidence to show that the damage was caused by collapse, the appeals court found, and the trial court had erred in awarding the remaining damages.

Tara-Nicholle Nelson is author of "The Savvy Woman's Homebuying Handbook" and "Trillion Dollar Women: Use Your Power to Make Buying and Remodeling Decisions." Ask her a real estate question online or visit her Web site, www.rethinkrealestate.com.

***

What's your opinion? Leave your comments below or send a letter to the editor. To contact the writer, click the byline at the top of the story.


TODAY'S TOP REAL ESTATE NEWS
Provided by Inman News

  HOME |   ABOUT US |   CONTACT US |   BUYER / SELLER INFO |   PRIVACY POLICY |   TERMS OF USE |   FAIR HOUSING |   SITE MAP

Alabama Real EstateAlaska Real EstateArizona Real EstateArkansas Real EstateCalifornia Real EstateColorado Real EstateConnecticut Real EstateDelaware Real EstateDistrict of Columbia Real EstateFlorida Real EstateGeorgia Real EstateHawaii Real EstateIdaho Real EstateIllinois Real EstateIndiana Real EstateIowa Real EstateKansas Real EstateKentucky Real EstateLouisiana Real EstateMaine Real EstateMaryland Real EstateMassachusetts Real EstateMichigan Real EstateMinnesota Real EstateMississippi Real EstateMissouri Real EstateMontana Real EstateNebraska Real EstateNevada Real EstateNew Hampshire Real EstateNew Jersey Real EstateNew Mexico Real EstateNew York Real EstateNorth Carolina Real EstateNorth Dakota Real EstateOhio Real EstateOklahoma Real EstateOregon Real EstatePennsylvania Real EstateRhode Island Real EstateSouth Carolina Real EstateSouth Dakota Real EstateTennessee Real EstateTexas Real EstateUtah Real EstateVermont Real EstateVirginia Real EstateWashington Real EstateWashington, D.C. Real EstateWest Virginia Real EstateWisconsin Real EstateWyoming Real Estate

MLS.com is an independently owned and operated Real Estate Advertising Service Company for Real Estate firms, Mortgage firms, Insurance companies
and other real estate related entities. MLS.com does not work directly with any real estate buyers or sellers. MLS.com does not receive any commissions or referral fees from any resulting transactions. Your use of this web site constitutes your acceptance of the MLS.com Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. The mark: "MLS.com America's Real Estate Portal" is a servicemark of Nanning Billin Network, Ltd. The mark 'Realtor' is a servicemark of the National Association of Realtors to designate a real estate professional who is a member of the National Association of Realtors.
Copyright © 2004 - 2008 Nanning Billin Network, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.